Evaluation of credit guarantee policy using propensity score matching

被引:94
|
作者
Oh, Inha [1 ]
Lee, Jeong-Dong [1 ]
Heshmati, Almas [2 ]
Choi, Gyoung-Gyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Technol Management Econ & Policy Program, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[2] Univ Kurdistan Hawler, Dept Econ, Fed Region Of Kurdistan, Erbil, Iraq
[3] Dongguk Univ, Sch Business Adm, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Credit guarantee; Selection bias; Propensity score matching; SME; SAMPLE PROPERTIES; PRODUCTIVITY; DETERMINANTS; MARKETS; DESIGN; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11187-008-9102-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, we evaluate the effect of the credit guarantee policy by comparing a large sample of guaranteed firms and matched non-guaranteed firms from 2000 to 2003. The sample firms are compared with respect to growth rates of different performance indicators including: productivity, sales, employment, investment, R&D, wage level, and the survival of firms in the post crisis period. In order to avoid the selectivity problem, propensity score matching methodologies are adopted. Results suggest that credit guarantees influenced significantly firms' ability to maintain their size, and increase their survival rate, but not to increase their R&D and investment and hence, their growth in productivity. Moreover, due to the adverse selection problem, firms with lower productivity were receiving guarantees.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 351
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of credit guarantee policy using propensity score matching
    Inha Oh
    Jeong-Dong Lee
    Almas Heshmati
    Gyoung-Gyu Choi
    Small Business Economics, 2009, 33 : 335 - 351
  • [2] A Microeconometric Evaluation of a Consumer Advice Service Applying Propensity Score Matching
    Gaus, Hansjoerg
    Mueller, Christoph E.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVALUATION, 2011, 10 (02): : 249 - 266
  • [3] AES Impact Evaluation With Integrated Farm Data: Combining Statistical Matching and Propensity Score Matching
    D'Alberto, Riccardo
    Zavalloni, Matteo
    Raggi, Meri
    Viaggi, Davide
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [4] Propensity score matching and randomization
    Mnatzaganian, George
    Davidson, David C.
    Hiller, Janet E.
    Ryan, Philip
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (07) : 760 - 768
  • [5] On the inefficiency of propensity score matching
    Froelich, Markus
    ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 91 (03) : 279 - 290
  • [6] EMPLOYMENT EFFECTS OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING: AN EVALUATION USING PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
    Donato, Luisa
    Migliore, Maria Cristina
    Poy, Samuele
    POLITICA ECONOMICA, 2018, 34 (03) : 273 - 296
  • [7] Evaluation of investment support from Common Agricultural Policy with propensity score matching method
    Pawlowska, Aleksandra
    12TH PROFESSOR ALEKSANDER ZELIAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND FORECASTING OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PHENOMENA, 2018, 1 : 365 - 374
  • [8] Using Propensity Score Matching in Educational Research
    Fan, Xitao
    Nowell, Dana L.
    GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2011, 55 (01) : 74 - 79
  • [9] PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING AND ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO INDIVIDUALS MATCHING FOR COUNTERFACTUAL EVALUATION PURPOSES
    Svarc, Michal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN ECONOMICS: MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING XVIII, 2016, : 381 - 387
  • [10] Application and comparison of generalized propensity score matching versus pairwise propensity score matching
    Cui, Zhanglin L.
    Hess, Lisa M.
    Goodloe, Robert
    Faries, Doug
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (09) : 923 - 933