Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status After Positive Sentinel Biopsy in Breast Cancer: What Model Performs the Best in a Czech Population?

被引:47
作者
Coufal, Oldrich [1 ]
Pavlik, Tomas [2 ]
Fabian, Pavel [3 ]
Bori, Rita [4 ]
Boross, Gabor [5 ]
Sejben, Istvan [4 ]
Maraz, Robert [5 ]
Koca, Jaroslav [7 ]
Krejci, Eva [3 ]
Horakova, Iva [3 ]
Foltinova, Vendula [1 ]
Vrtelova, Pavlina [1 ]
Chrenko, Vojtech [1 ]
Tekle, Wolde Eliza [6 ]
Rajtar, Maria [6 ]
Svebis, Mihaly [5 ]
Fait, Vuk [1 ]
Cserni, Gabor [4 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Mem Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Brno 65653, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, Inst Biostat & Anal, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
[3] Masaryk Mem Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, Brno 65653, Czech Republic
[4] Bacs Kiskun Cty Teaching Hosp, Dept Pathol, Kecskemet, Hungary
[5] Bacs Kiskun Cty Teaching Hosp, Dept Surg, Kecskemet, Hungary
[6] Bacs Kiskun Cty Teaching Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Kecskemet, Hungary
[7] ADDS&DSC Int Sro, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
关键词
Breast cancer; Lymphatic metastasis; Nomogram; Prediction; Sentinel lymph node biopsy; Tumor cells; Isolated; COMPLETION AXILLARY DISSECTION; MSKCC NOMOGRAM; INVOLVEMENT; LIKELIHOOD; VALIDATION; METASTASES; DISEASE; MICROMETASTASES; LIMITATIONS; RATES;
D O I
10.1007/s12253-009-9177-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Several models have previously been proposed to predict the probability of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of two previously published nomograms (MSKCC, Stanford) and to develop an alternative model with the best predictive accuracy in a Czech population. In the basic population of 330 SLN-positive patients from the Czech Republic, the accuracy of the MSKCC and the Stanford nomograms was tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). A new model (MOU nomogram) was proposed according to the results of multivariate analysis of relevant clinicopathologic variables. The new model was validated in an independent test population from Hungary (383 patients). In the basic population, six of 27 patients with isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the SLN harbored additional NSLN metastases. The AUCs of the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms were 0.68 and 0.66, respectively; for the MOU nomogram it reached 0.76. In the test population, the AUC of the MOU nomogram was similar to that of the basic population (0.74). The presence of only ITC in SLN does not preclude further nodal involvement. Additional variables are beneficial when considering the probability of NSLN metastases. In the basic population, the previously published nomograms (MSKCC and Stanford) showed only limited accuracy. The developed MOU nomogram proved more suitable for the basic population, such as for another independent population from a mid-European country.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 740
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy
    Alran, Severine
    De Rycke, Yann
    Fourchotte, Virginie
    Charitansky, Helene
    Laki, Fatima
    Falcou, Marie Christine
    Benamor, Myriam
    Frencaux, Paul
    Salmon, Remy Jacques
    Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (08) : 2195 - 2201
  • [2] The likelihood of additional nodal disease following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: validation of a nomogram
    Cripe, Mark H.
    Beran, LeAnn C.
    Liang, Wen C.
    Sickle-Santanello, Brenda J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 192 (04) : 484 - 487
  • [3] Complete sectioning of axillary sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. Analysis of two differenct step sectioning and immunohistochemistry protocols in 246 patients
    Cserni, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (12) : 926 - 931
  • [4] Comparison of vital dye-guided lymphatic mapping and dye plus gamma probe-guided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer
    Cserni, G
    Rajtár, M
    Boross, G
    Sinkó, W
    Svébis, M
    Baltás, B
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (05) : 592 - 597
  • [5] Minimal disease in sentinel nodes
    Cserni, Gabor
    [J]. PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (02) : 117 - 121
  • [6] Variations in sentinel node isolated tumour cells/micrometastasis and non-sentinel node involvement rates according to different interpretations of the TNM definitions
    Cserni, Gabor
    Bianchi, Simonetta
    Vezzosi, Vania
    van Diest, Paul
    van Deurzen, Carolien
    Sejben, Istvan
    Regitnig, Peter
    Asslaber, Martin
    Foschini, Maria P.
    Sapino, Anna
    Castellano, Isabella
    Callagy, Grace
    Arkoumani, Evdokia
    Kulka, Janina
    Wells, Clive A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (15) : 2185 - 2191
  • [7] Comparison of different validation studies on the use of the Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predicting nonsentinel node involvement in sentinel node-positive breast cancer patients
    Cserni, Gabor
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 194 (05) : 699 - 700
  • [8] Distinction between isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in breast cancer - Is it reliable and useful?
    de Mascarel, Isabelle
    MacGrogan, Gaetan
    Debled, Marc
    Brouste, Veronique
    Mauriac, Louis
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (08) : 1672 - 1678
  • [9] Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram
    Degnim, AC
    Reynolds, C
    Pantvaidya, G
    Zakaria, S
    Hoskin, T
    Barnes, S
    Roberts, MV
    Lucas, PC
    Oh, K
    Koker, M
    Sabel, MS
    Newman, LA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (04) : 543 - 550
  • [10] THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) : 29 - 36