Solution of potential flow problems by the modified method of fundamental solutions: Formulations with the single layer and the double layer fundamental solutions

被引:141
作者
Sarler, Bozidar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Gorica, Lab Multiphase Proc, SI-5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia
关键词
Potential flow; Method of fundamental solutions; Desingularisation; Two-dimensional Cartesian coordinates; Single layer fundamental solution; Double layer fundamental solution; BOUNDARY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enganabound.2009.06.008
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper describes an application of the recently proposed modified method of fundamental solutions (MMFS) to potential flow problems. The solution in two-dimensional Cartesian coordinates is represented in terms of the single layer and the double layer fundamental solutions. Collocation is used for the determination of the expansion coefficients. This novel method does not require a fictitious boundary as the conventional method of fundamental solutions (MFS). The source and the collocation points thus coincide on the physical boundary of the system. The desingularised values, consistent with the fundamental solutions used, are deduced from the direct boundary element method (BEM) integral equations by assuming a linear shape of the boundary between the collocation points. The respective values of the derivatives of the fundamental solution in the coordinate directions, as required in potential flow calculations, are calculated indirectly from the considerations of the constant potential field. The normal on the boundary is calculated by parametrisation of its length and the use of the cubic radial basis functions with the second-order polynomial augmentation. The components of the normal are calculated in an analytical way. A numerical example of potential flow around a two-dimensional circular region is presented. The results with the new MMFS are compared with the results of the classical MFS and the analytical solution. It is shown that the MMFS gives better accuracy for the potential, velocity components (partial derivatives of the potential), and absolute value of the velocity as compared with the classical MFS. The results with the single layer fundamental solution are more accurate than the results with the double layer fundamental solution. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1374 / 1382
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Aliabadi MH, 2002, The boundary element method: Applications in solids and structures, V2
[2]   The method of fundamental solutions for linear diffusion-reaction equations [J].
Balakrishnan, K ;
Ramachandran, PA .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2000, 31 (2-3) :221-237
[3]  
Banerjee PK, 1981, BOUNDARY ELEMENT MET
[4]  
BERGER JR, 1999, INT J NUMERICAL METH, V45, P1618
[5]  
Chen C.S., 2008, METHOD FUNDAMENTAL S
[6]   The method of fundamental solutions for elliptic boundary value problems [J].
Fairweather, G ;
Karageorghis, A .
ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS, 1998, 9 (1-2) :69-95
[7]   SOURCE FIELD SUPERPOSITION ANALYSIS OF 2-DIMENSIONAL POTENTIAL PROBLEMS [J].
FENNER, RT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1991, 32 (05) :1079-1091
[8]  
Golberg M.A., 1998, Boundary Integral Methods, P103
[9]  
Golberg M.A., 1997, Discrete Projection Methods for Integral Equations
[10]   Boundary integral methods for multicomponent fluids and multiphase materials [J].
Hou, TY ;
Lowengrub, JS ;
Shelley, MJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2001, 169 (02) :302-362