Integrating GIS-based field data and farm modeling in a watershed to assess the cost of erosion control measures: An example from southwest Germany

被引:9
作者
Aurbacher, J. [1 ]
Dabbert, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Farm Management, D-7000 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
cost; CULTIVASIM; erosion control; field shape; geographical information system (GIS); precision conservation; PRECISION CONSERVATION; SYSTEM; AGRICULTURE; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; LANDSCAPE; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.2489/jswc.64.5.350
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Policy measures regulating agricultural production are becoming increasingly important in the control of erosion and water runoff. In order to enable planners and other authorities to implement such measures efficiently, detailed information regarding the relevant costs and benefits is necessary. However, economic models to date have tended to utilize a spatial resolution that is insufficient to reveal the effects of such measures on a micro scale. Farming practices, like cross-slope cultivation, filter strips, or field divisions, exert varying impacts on small spatial structures. The benefits and costs of such measures depend to a large degree on local conditions, such as field size and slope. Environmental models as well as economic modeling must take these factors into account. This paper presents a novel approach called CULTIVASIM that directly incorporates field-level topographic and geometric data into a farm economic model. This allows researchers to gain insight into the cost structure of these tasks on a field level as well as a farm level when considering whole-farm adaptation possibilities. Results show that while falter strips lead to relatively uniform costs in relation to area, the costs of field division and cross-slope cultivation vary greatly depending on the field geometry. This information should be included when planning control measures and designing compensation schemes. This new model approach can be used to calculate the economic costs and benefits of using precision conservation practices across the landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 362
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]  
KAPUR JN, 1989, MAXIMUM ENTROPY MODE, P2
[22]  
Kitchen NR, 2005, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V60, P421
[23]  
*KTBL, 2001, DAT BETR LANDW 2001
[24]  
*KTBL, 2002, TASCH LANDW 2002 03
[25]  
*LAND MASCH BAD WU, 2003, VERR BAD WURTT GULT
[26]   Using GIS-based ecological-economic modeling to evaluate policies affecting agricultural watersheds [J].
Lant, CL ;
Kraft, SE ;
Beaulieu, J ;
Bennett, D ;
Loftus, T ;
Nicklow, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 55 (04) :467-484
[27]   Combining dynamic economic analysis and environmental impact modelling:: Addressing uncertainty and complexity of agricultural development [J].
Lehtonen, Heikki ;
Barlund, Ilona ;
Tattari, Sirkka ;
Hilden, Mikael .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (05) :710-718
[28]  
*LEL, 2003, KALK MARKT SCHW GMUN
[29]  
*LEL, 2001, KALK FUTT
[30]  
*LEL LANDL RAUM, 2001, KALK MILCHV