Trunk kinematic variability as a function of time during the early phase of a repetitive lifting task

被引:1
作者
Tetteh, Emmanuel [1 ]
Mirka, Gary A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Ergon Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
low back pain; repetitive lifting; trunk kinematics; kinetics; variability;
D O I
10.1002/hfm.20888
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Lift-to-lift variability occurs in repetitive lifting tasks due to alterations in the lifting techniques used by the lifter, resulting in variability in lower back tissue loading. Understanding how trunk variability changes with time in the initial phases of a lifting bout may provide insights into the risk of injury during work startup. The purpose of this study was to quantify the variation of lifting kinematics and kinetics during the initial phase of a lifting bout. Twenty participants performed a repetitive lifting task continuously for 30 min. The load was equivalent to 10% of each participant's body weight and lifting was done at a rate of six lifts/min. Kinematic variables (three-dimensional range of motion, angular velocity, and angular acceleration) of the trunk were measured using the Lumbar Motion Monitor and a dynamic biomechanical model estimated peak L5/S1 moment and spine compression. The variances of these variables were compared across 10-min intervals: 0-10 min, 10-20 min, and 20-30 min. Results indicate a significant reduction in the variance of the peak sagittal acceleration, the sagittal range of motion, the transverse range of motion, peak sagittal moment, and peak spine compression between the first and second time intervals, followed by no significant change in variance between the second and third intervals. The downward trend in variation of these kinematic and kinetic variables suggests an initial adjustment period as the lifters reach a steady state of their lifting technique. The reduced variance of spinal loading may reduce the probability that a tissue tolerance is exceeded.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MUSCULOSKELETAL DISO
[2]   The effect of muscle fatigue and low back pain on lumbar movement variability and complexity [J].
Bauer, C. M. ;
Rast, F. M. ;
Ernst, M. J. ;
Meichtry, A. ;
Kool, J. ;
Rissanen, S. M. ;
Suni, J. H. ;
Kankaanaa, M. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2017, 33 :94-102
[3]  
Bazrgari B., 2006, Spine, pS101, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0021-9290(06)83302-6
[4]   Day of the week lost time occupational injury trends in the US by gender and industry and their implications for work scheduling [J].
Brogmus, G. E. .
ERGONOMICS, 2007, 50 (03) :446-474
[5]  
Chaffin D.B., 2006, OCCUPATIONAL BIOMECH
[6]   Variation in spinal load and trunk dynamics during repeated lifting exertions [J].
Granata, KP ;
Marras, WS ;
Davis, KG .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 14 (06) :367-375
[7]   Back pain prevalence in US industry and estimates of lost workdays [J].
Guo, HR ;
Tanaka, S ;
Halperin, WE ;
Cameron, LL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (07) :1029-1035
[8]   The Effects of Anthropometric Scaling Parameters on Normalized Muscle Strength in Uninjured Baseball Pitchers [J].
Hurd, Wendy J. ;
Morrey, Bernard F. ;
Kaufman, Kenton R. .
JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2011, 20 (03) :311-320
[9]   Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: Socioeconomic factors and consequences [J].
Katz, JN .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A :21-24
[10]   Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond [J].
Krakauer, John W. ;
Mazzoni, Pietro .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (04) :636-644