Adjacent Segment Degeneration Versus Disease After Lumbar Spine Fusion for Degenerative Pathology A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of the Literature

被引:84
|
作者
Zhang, Chao [1 ]
Berven, Sigurd H. [2 ]
Fortin, Maryse [3 ]
Weber, Michael H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Navy Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Montreal Gen Hosp Site,1650 Cedar Ave,A5-169, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2016年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
adjacent segment degeneration; adjacent segment disease; lumbar fusion; incidence rate; risk factors; INTERBODY FUSION; DISC DEGENERATION; FOLLOW-UP; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; MOTION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; FIXATION; STENOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000328
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A systematic review. Objective: The purpose of this study was to review the published literature to estimate rates and identify risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and adjacent segment disease (ASDis) after lumbar fusion. Summary of Background Data: Arthrodesis remains a common intervention for the surgical treatment of degenerative spinal disease. Clinical studies have demonstrated variability in the rates of adjacent segment pathology after lumbar fusion. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Symptoms of ASDis were distinguished and defined by the need for a revision surgery procedure to address adjacent level pathology. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Extracted data included average patient age, average time to follow-up, type of intervention, potential risk factors, and ASDeg and ASDis incidence. Funnel and forest plots were used to describe heterogeneity and meta-regression to estimate pooled incidence of ASDeg and ASDis. Results: A total of 31 articles with 4206 patients were included for analysis. Combining all extractable data, the overall pooled incidence of ASDeg was 5.9% per year (95% CI, 4.8%, 7.2%), and ASDis was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.3%, 2.4%) per year. The incidence of ASDeg is higher with more motion segments. Sex, age, segmental sagittal alignment, fusion methods, and instrumentation were not associated with an increased risk of ASDeg or ASDis. Radiographic ASDeg did not show strong correlation with clinical outcomes. Conclusions: The prevalence of ASDeg and ASDis has been variably reported in the literature, and fusion length is the factor most significantly associated with adjacent segment pathology. In guiding surgical strategies to avoid adjacent segment pathology, limiting the number of levels fused may have a greater impact than changes in fusion strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 29
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion surgery in treatment for degenerative lumbar disorders: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Tao
    Ding, Wenyuan
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [2] Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cannizzaro, Delia
    Anania, Carla D.
    Safa, Adrian
    Zaed, Ismail
    Morenghi, Manuela
    Riva, Marco
    Tomei, Massimo
    Pessina, Federico
    Servadei, Franco
    Ortolina, Alessandro
    Fornari, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (06) : 740 - 749
  • [3] Impact of Body Mass Index on Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease
    Ou, Chien-Yu
    Lee, Tao-Chen
    Lee, Tsung-Han
    Huang, Yu-Hua
    NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 76 (04) : 396 - 401
  • [4] Does decompression adjacent to arthrodesis in the lumbar spine predispose patients to adjacent segment degeneration and disease: A retrospective analysis
    Paziuk, Taylor
    Neuman, Brian J.
    Conaway, William
    Kothari, Parth
    Henry, Tyler W.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 40 : 52 - 56
  • [5] Prevalence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Spine Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xia, Xiao-Peng
    Chen, Hong-Lin
    Cheng, Hong-Bin
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (07) : 597 - 608
  • [6] Finite element analysis in adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion
    Yan, Jia-Zhi
    Qiu, Gui-Xing
    Wu, Zhi-Hong
    Wang, Xue-Song
    Xing, Ze-Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2011, 7 (01) : 96 - 100
  • [7] Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion surgery in treatment for degenerative lumbar disorders: a meta-analysis
    Tao Wang
    Wenyuan Ding
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [8] Predicting the Risk of Adjacent Segment Pathology After Lumbar Fusion A Systematic Review
    Lawrence, Brandon D.
    Wang, Jeff
    Arnold, Paul M.
    Hermsmeyer, Jeff
    Norvell, Daniel C.
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (22) : S123 - S132
  • [9] Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis
    Pan, Aixing
    Hai, Yong
    Yang, Jincai
    Zhou, Lijin
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Guo, Hui
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (05) : 1522 - 1532
  • [10] Comparative effectiveness of cortical bone trajectory screws and pedicle screws in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shang, Qisong
    Luan, Haopeng
    Peng, Cong
    Song, Xinghua
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):