Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculations of intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for head and neck cancer

被引:49
|
作者
Choi, Youngmin
Kim, Jeung-Kee
Lee, Hyung-Sik
Hur, Won-Joo
Hong, Young-Seoub
Park, Sungkwang
Ahn, Kijung
Cho, Heunglae
机构
[1] Dong A Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pusan 602175, South Korea
[2] Dong A Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Pusan 602175, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pusan, South Korea
关键词
contrast agent; dose calculation; intensity modulated radiation therapy; head and neck cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.09.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To evaluate the effect of an intravenous contrast agent (CA) on dose calculations and its clinical significance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for head and neck cancer. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with head and neck cancer and involved neck nodes were enrolled. Each patient took two sets of computerized tomography (CT) in the same position before and after intravenous CA injections. Target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were contoured on the enhanced CT, and then an IMRT plan of nine equiangular beams with a 6 MV X-ray was created. After the fusion of non-enhanced and enhanced CTs, the contours and the IMRT plan created from the enhanced CT were copied and placed to the non-enhanced CT. Doses were calculated again from the non-enhanced CT by the same IMRT plan. The radiation doses calculated from the two sets of CTs were compared with regard to planning target volumes (PTV) and the three OARs, both parotid glands and the spinal cord, by Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Results: The doses (maximum, mean, and the dose of 95% of PTV received (D-95%)) of PTV70 and PTV59.4 calculated from the enhanced CTs were lower than those from the non-enhanced CTs (p < 0.05), but the dose differences were less than 1% compared to the doses calculated from the enhanced CTs. The doses of PTV50.4, parotid glands, and spinal cord were not significantly different between the non-enhanced and enhanced CTs. Conclusions: The difference between the doses calculated from the CTs with and without CA enhancement was tolerably small, therefore using intravenous CA could be recommended for the planning CT of head and neck IMRT. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 162
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of intravenous contrast used in computed tomography on radiation dose to carotid arteries and thyroid in intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Lee, Victor Ho Fun
    Ng, Sherry Chor Yi
    Kwong, Dora Lai Wan
    Lam, Ka On
    Leung, To Wai
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [32] Late Toxicities of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma
    Lockney, Natalie A.
    Friedman, Danielle Novetsky
    Wexler, Leonard H.
    Sklar, Charles A.
    Casey, Dana L.
    Wolden, Suzanne L.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2016, 63 (09) : 1608 - 1614
  • [33] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: The Mallinckrodt experience
    Chao, KSC
    Low, DA
    Perez, CA
    Purdy, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 90 (02) : 92 - 103
  • [34] Patterns of Care and Outcomes Associated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Older Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Yu, James B.
    Soulos, Pamela R.
    Sharma, Richa
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Decker, Roy H.
    Smith, Benjamin D.
    Desai, Rani A.
    Cramer, Laura D.
    Gross, Cary P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01): : E101 - E107
  • [35] Correlating planned radiation dose to the cochlea with primary site and tumor stage in patients with head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Zhang, Jeanette
    Qureshi, Muhammad M.
    Kovalchuk, Nataliya
    Truong, Minh Tam
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [36] The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Hong, TS
    Tomé, WA
    Chappell, RJ
    Chinnaiyan, P
    Mehta, MP
    Harari, PM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03): : 779 - 788
  • [37] Influence of multi-leaf collimator leaf transmission on head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning
    Motoharu Sasaki
    Masahide Tominaga
    Takeshi Kamomae
    Hitoshi Ikushima
    Motonori Kitaoka
    Ryota Bando
    Kanako Sakuragawa
    Masataka Oita
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2017, 35 : 511 - 525
  • [38] Validation of a rapid algorithm for repeated intensity modulated radiation therapy dose calculations
    Shaffer, Nathan
    Snyder, Jeffrey
    St-Aubin, Joel
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2025, 11 (01):
  • [39] Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study
    Holt, Andrea
    Van Gestel, Dirk
    Arends, Mark P.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Schuring, Danny
    Kunze-Busch, Martina C.
    Louwe, Rob J. W.
    van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, Corine
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [40] Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study
    Andrea Holt
    Dirk Van Gestel
    Mark P Arends
    Erik W Korevaar
    Danny Schuring
    Martina C Kunze-Busch
    Rob JW Louwe
    Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij
    Radiation Oncology, 8