Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculations of intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for head and neck cancer

被引:49
|
作者
Choi, Youngmin
Kim, Jeung-Kee
Lee, Hyung-Sik
Hur, Won-Joo
Hong, Young-Seoub
Park, Sungkwang
Ahn, Kijung
Cho, Heunglae
机构
[1] Dong A Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pusan 602175, South Korea
[2] Dong A Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Pusan 602175, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pusan, South Korea
关键词
contrast agent; dose calculation; intensity modulated radiation therapy; head and neck cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.09.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To evaluate the effect of an intravenous contrast agent (CA) on dose calculations and its clinical significance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for head and neck cancer. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with head and neck cancer and involved neck nodes were enrolled. Each patient took two sets of computerized tomography (CT) in the same position before and after intravenous CA injections. Target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were contoured on the enhanced CT, and then an IMRT plan of nine equiangular beams with a 6 MV X-ray was created. After the fusion of non-enhanced and enhanced CTs, the contours and the IMRT plan created from the enhanced CT were copied and placed to the non-enhanced CT. Doses were calculated again from the non-enhanced CT by the same IMRT plan. The radiation doses calculated from the two sets of CTs were compared with regard to planning target volumes (PTV) and the three OARs, both parotid glands and the spinal cord, by Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Results: The doses (maximum, mean, and the dose of 95% of PTV received (D-95%)) of PTV70 and PTV59.4 calculated from the enhanced CTs were lower than those from the non-enhanced CTs (p < 0.05), but the dose differences were less than 1% compared to the doses calculated from the enhanced CTs. The doses of PTV50.4, parotid glands, and spinal cord were not significantly different between the non-enhanced and enhanced CTs. Conclusions: The difference between the doses calculated from the CTs with and without CA enhancement was tolerably small, therefore using intravenous CA could be recommended for the planning CT of head and neck IMRT. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 162
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Choosing an intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer
    Lee, Nancy
    Mechalakos, James
    Puri, Dev R.
    Hunt, Margie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (05): : 1299 - 1309
  • [22] Spinal cord planning risk volumes for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head-and-neck cancer
    Breen, SL
    Craig, T
    Bayley, A
    O'Sullivan, B
    Kim, J
    Jaffray, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (01): : 321 - 325
  • [23] A prospective trial of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer
    Fung-Kee-Fung, Simon D.
    Hackett, Rachel
    Hales, Lee
    Warren, Graham
    Singh, Anurag K.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 3 (04): : 57 - 62
  • [24] Evaluation of a leaf position optimization tool for intensity modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
    Claus, F
    De Gersem, W
    Vanhoutte, I
    Duthoy, W
    Remouchamps, V
    De Wagter, C
    De Neve, W
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 (03) : 281 - 286
  • [25] Evaluation of dose calculations with inhomogeneity correction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophagus cancer
    Li, Xiaobo
    Xu, Benhua
    Lei, Yu
    Zhang, Jianping
    Lin, Zhixing
    Li, Sicong
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 26 (04) : 657 - 666
  • [26] Global and health-related quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Hess, Clayton B.
    Chen, Allen M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2012, 12 (11) : 1469 - 1477
  • [27] Tongue surface model can predict radiation tongue mucositis due to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Musha, A.
    Fukata, K.
    Saitoh, J. -l.
    Shirai, K.
    Abe, T.
    Mizukami, T.
    Kawashima, M.
    Yokoo, S.
    Chikamatsu, K.
    Ohno, T.
    Nakano, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [28] Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: A dosimetric comparison
    Nguyen, My-Lien
    Cantrell, J. Nathan
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Henson, Christina
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (03) : 259 - 263
  • [29] Influence of multi-leaf collimator leaf transmission on head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning
    Sasaki, Motoharu
    Tominaga, Masahide
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Ikushima, Hitoshi
    Kitaoka, Motonori
    Bando, Ryota
    Sakuragawa, Kanako
    Oita, Masataka
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 35 (09) : 511 - 525
  • [30] Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning based on virtual monochromatic images for head and neck cancer: effect of the contrast-enhanced agent on dose distribution
    Komiyama, Riho
    Ohira, Shingo
    Kanayama, Naoyuki
    Karino, Tsukasa
    Washio, Hayate
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Miyazaki, Masayoshi
    Teshima, Teruki
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (11): : 144 - 152