Experimental and numerical prediction of lean blowout limits for micro gas turbine combustor

被引:2
作者
Kirubaharan, V [1 ]
Bhatt, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Inst Sci &, Dept Aeronaut Engn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Combustion; Lean blowout limit; Micro gas turbine combustor;
D O I
10.1108/AEAT-04-2020-0066
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Purpose The lean blowout (LBO) limit of the combustor is one of the important performance parameters for any gas turbine combustor design. This study aims to predict the LBO limits of an in-house designed swirl stabilized 3kW can-type micro gas turbine combustor. Design/methodology/approach The experimental prediction of LBO limits was performed on 3kW swirl stabilized combustor fueled with methane for the combustor inlet velocity ranging from 1.70 m/s to 6.80 m/s. The numerical prediction of LBO limits of combustor was performed on two-dimensional axisymmetric model. The blowout limits of combustor were predicted through calculated average exit gas temperature (AEGT) method and compared with experimental predictions. Findings The results show that the predicted LBO equivalence ratio decreases gradually with an increase in combustor inlet velocity. Practical implications This LBO limits predictions will use to fix the operating boundary conditions of 3kW can-type micro gas turbine combustor. This methodology will be used in design stage as well as in the testing stage of the combustor. Originality/value This is a first effort to predict the LBO limits on micro gas turbine combustor through AEGT method. The maximum uncertainty in LBO limit prediction with AEGT is 6 % in comparison with experimental results.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 614
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Prediction of lean blowout performance of gas turbine combustor based on flow structures [J].
Ahmed, E. ;
Yong, H. .
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 122 (1248) :238-259
[2]   Flame volume prediction and validation for lean blow-out of gas turbine combustor [J].
Ahmed, E. ;
Huang, Y. .
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 121 (1236) :237-262
[3]   Hybrid Lean Blowout Prediction Methodology with Reactive Flow Simulation [J].
Ahmed, Ejaz ;
Huang, Yong .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 189 (10) :1776-1795
[4]  
Beer J.M., 1974, COMBUSTION AERODYNAM
[5]   A Comparison of the Blow-Off Behaviour of Swirl-Stabilized Premixed, Non-Premixed and Spray Flames [J].
Cavaliere, Davide E. ;
Kariuki, James ;
Mastorakos, Epaminondas .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2013, 91 (02) :347-372
[6]  
Chen X., FUELS COMBUSTION MAT, DOI [10.1115/POWER2013-98199, DOI 10.1115/POWER2013-98199]
[7]  
Gokulakrishnan, 2015, COMBUSTION FUELS E B, DOI 10.1115/GT2015-43433
[8]   Influence of Single-Component Fuels on Gas-Turbine Model Combustor Lean Blowout [J].
Grohmann, J. ;
Rauch, B. ;
Kathrotia, T. ;
Meier, W. ;
Aigner, M. .
JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2018, 34 (01) :97-107
[9]  
Hu B., 2011, P ASME TURB EXP 2011, DOI [10.1115/GT2011-45467, DOI 10.1115/GT2011-45467]
[10]   A Hybrid Semi-empirical Model for Lean Blow-Out Limit Predictions of Aero-engine Combustors [J].
Hu, Bin ;
Huang, Yong ;
Xu, Jianzhong .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (03)