A Systems View of Mother-Infant Face-to-Face Communication

被引:140
|
作者
Beebe, Beatrice [1 ]
Messinger, Daniel [2 ]
Bahrick, Lorraine E. [3 ]
Margolis, Amy [1 ]
Buck, Karen A. [1 ]
Chen, Henian [4 ]
机构
[1] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Div Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Dept Psychiat, 108,1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Psychol, POB 248185, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Dept Psychol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
mother-infant face-to-face communication; dynamic systems; self- and interactive contingency; MATERNAL RESPONSIVENESS; BEHAVIOR; SYNCHRONY; CONTINGENCIES; ATTACHMENT; DYNAMICS; MICROANALYSIS; 3-MONTH-OLD; SENSITIVITY; DEPENDENCY;
D O I
10.1037/a0040085
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Principles of a dynamic, dyadic systems view of mother-infant face-to-face communication, which considers self-and interactive processes in relation to one another, were tested. The process of interaction across time in a large low-risk community sample at infant age 4 months was examined. Split-screen videotape was coded on a 1-s time base for communication modalities of attention, affect, orientation, touch, and composite facial-visual engagement. Time-series approaches generated self-and interactive contingency estimates in each modality. Evidence supporting the following principles was obtained: (a) Significant moment-to-moment predictability within each partner (self-contingency) and between the partners (interactive contingency) characterizes mother-infant communication. (b) Interactive contingency is organized by a bidirectional, but asymmetrical, process: Maternal contingent coordination with infant is higher than infant contingent coordination with mother. (c) Self-contingency organizes communication to a far greater extent than interactive contingency. (d) Self-and interactive contingency processes are not separate; each affects the other in communication modalities of facial affect, facial-visual engagement, and orientation. Each person's self-organization exists in a dynamic, homoeostatic (negative feedback) balance with the degree to which the person coordinates with the partner. For example, those individuals who are less facially stable are likely to coordinate more strongly with the partner's facial affect and vice versa. Our findings support the concept that the dyad is a fundamental unit of analysis in the investigation of early interaction. Moreover, an individual's self-contingency is influenced by the way the individual coordinates with the partner. Our results imply that it is not appropriate to conceptualize interactive processes without simultaneously accounting for dynamically interrelated self-organizing processes.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 571
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mother-Infant Face-to-Face Intermodal Discrepancy and Risk
    Beebe, Beatrice
    COMPANION PUBLICATON OF THE 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (ICMI '20 COMPANION), 2020, : 365 - 369
  • [2] Interdyad Differences in Early Mother-Infant Face-to-Face Communication: Real-Time Dynamics and Developmental Pathways
    Lavelli, Manuela
    Fogel, Alan
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 49 (12) : 2257 - 2271
  • [3] Physiological reactions during mother-infant and father-infant face-to-face interaction
    Tojal, C.
    Costa, R.
    17TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, : 45 - 50
  • [4] Mother-Infant Vagal Regulation in the Face-To-Face Still-Face Paradigm Is Moderated by Maternal Sensitivity
    Moore, Ginger A.
    Hill-Soderlund, Ashley L.
    Propper, Cathi B.
    Calkins, Susan D.
    Mills-Koonce, W. Roger.
    Cox, Martha J.
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 80 (01) : 209 - 223
  • [5] Family Nurture Intervention for Preterm Infants Facilitates Positive Mother-Infant Face-to-Face Engagement at 4 Months
    Beebe, Beatrice
    Myers, Michael M.
    Lee, Sang Han
    Lange, Adrianne
    Ewing, Julie
    Rubinchik, Nataliya
    Andrews, Howard
    Austin, Judy
    Hane, Arnie
    Margolis, Amy E.
    Hofer, Myron
    Ludwig, Robert J.
    Welch, Martha G.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 54 (11) : 2016 - 2031
  • [6] Father- and mother-infant face-to-face interactions: Differences in mind-related comments and infant attachment?
    Lundy, BL
    INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 26 (02) : 200 - 212
  • [7] Dynamics of mother-infant parasympathetic regulation during face-to-face interaction: The role of maternal emotion dysregulation
    Gao, Mengyu
    Vlisides-Henry, Robert D. D.
    Kaliush, Parisa R. R.
    Thomas, Leah
    Butner, Jonathan
    Raby, K. Lee
    Conradt, Elisabeth
    Crowell, Sheila E. E.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 60 (06)
  • [8] The impact of infant carrying on adolescent mother-infant interactions during the still-face task
    Williams, Lela Rankin
    INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 29 (03)
  • [9] The Bidirectional View of Mother-Infant Interaction by Gaze and Facial Affect
    KAHYA, Yasemin
    ULUC, Sait
    KARA, Yusuf
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2022, 33 (01) : 32 - 43
  • [10] Dynamic Infant-Parent Affect Coupling During the Face-to-Face/Still-Face
    Chow, Sy-Miin
    Haltigan, John D.
    Messinger, Daniel S.
    EMOTION, 2010, 10 (01) : 101 - 114