Snowpack density modeling is the primary source of uncertainty when mapping basin-wide SWE with lidar

被引:54
作者
Raleigh, Mark S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Small, Eric E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Geol Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, CIRES, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, NSIDC, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
WESTERN UNITED-STATES; RESIDUE-SOIL SYSTEM; WATER EQUIVALENT; SIERRA-NEVADA; SIMULTANEOUS HEAT; ENERGY EXCHANGE; ALPINE TERRAIN; SEASONAL SNOW; LOW-COST; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1002/2016GL071999
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Lidar-measured snow depth and model-estimated snow density can be combined to map snow water equivalent (SWE). This approach has the potential to transform research and operations in snow-dominated regions, but sources of uncertainty need quantification. We compared relative uncertainty contributions from lidar depth measurement and density modeling to SWE estimation, utilizing lidar data from the Tuolumne Basin (California). We found a density uncertainty of 0.048g cm(-3) by comparing output from four models. For typical lidar depth uncertainty (8cm), density estimation was the dominant source of SWE uncertainty when snow exceeded 60cm depth, representing >70% of snow cover and 90% of SWE volume throughout the basin in both 2014 and 2016. Density uncertainty accounts for 75% of the SWE uncertainty for a broader range of snowpack characteristics, as measured at SNOTEL stations throughout the western U.S. Reducing density uncertainty is essential for improved SWE mapping with lidar.
引用
收藏
页码:3700 / 3709
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Anderson E., 1976, NOAA TECHNICAL REPOR, V19, P1
[2]   Mountain hydrology of the western United States [J].
Bales, Roger C. ;
Molotch, Noah P. ;
Painter, Thomas H. ;
Dettinger, Michael D. ;
Rice, Robert ;
Dozier, Jeff .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (08)
[3]   Combining binary decision tree and geostatistical methods to estimate snow distribution in a mountain watershed [J].
Balk, B ;
Elder, K .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (01) :13-26
[4]   MeteoIO 2.4.2: a preprocessing library for meteorological data [J].
Bavay, M. ;
Egger, T. .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 7 (06) :3135-3151
[5]   Constraining snowmelt in a temperature-index model using simulated snow densities [J].
Bormann, Kathryn J. ;
Evans, Jason P. ;
McCabe, Matthew F. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 517 :652-667
[6]   Mapping snow depth in alpine terrain with unmanned aerial systems (UASs): potential and limitations [J].
Buhler, Yves ;
Adams, Marc S. ;
Bosch, Ruedi ;
Stoffel, Andreas .
CRYOSPHERE, 2016, 10 (03) :1075-1088
[7]   Representing spatial variability of snow water equivalent in hydrologic and land-surface models: A review [J].
Clark, Martyn P. ;
Hendrikx, Jordy ;
Slater, Andrew G. ;
Kavetski, Dmitri ;
Anderson, Brian ;
Cullen, Nicolas J. ;
Kerr, Tim ;
Hreinsson, Einar Oern ;
Woods, Ross A. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
[8]   Comparison of density cutters for snow profile observations [J].
Conger, Steven M. ;
McClung, David M. .
JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 2009, 55 (189) :163-169
[9]  
DALY C, 1994, J APPL METEOROL, V33, P140, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0140:ASTMFM>2.0.CO
[10]  
2