Groundwater quality forecasting using machine learning algorithms for irrigation purposes

被引:178
作者
El Bilali, Ali [1 ]
Taleb, Abdeslam [1 ]
Brouziyne, Youssef [2 ]
机构
[1] Hassan II Univ Casablanca, Fac Sci & Tech Mohammedia, Casablanca, Morocco
[2] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ UM6P, Int Water Res Inst, Ben Guerir, Morocco
关键词
Machine learning; Berrechid aquifer; Irrigation water quality; Sensitivity; Uncertainty; Prediction performance; WATER-QUALITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MODEL; RIVER; PREDICTION; REGION; MANAGEMENT; ADABOOST; AQUIFERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106625
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Using conventional methods to evaluate the irrigation water quality is usually expensive and laborious for the farmers, particularly in developing countries. However, the applications of artificial intelligence models can overcome this issue through forecasting and evaluating the irrigation water quality indexes of aquifer systems using physical parameters as features. This paper aims forecasting the Total Dissolved Solid (TDS), Potential Salinity (PS), Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP), Magnesium Adsorption Ratio (MAR), and the Residual Sodium Carbonate (RSC) parameters through Electrical Conductivity (EC), Temperature (T), and pH as inputs. To achieve this purpose, we developed and evaluated Adaptive Boosting (Adaboost), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) models using 520 samples of data related to fourteen Groundwater quality parameters in Berrechid aquifer, Morocco. The results revealed that the overall prediction performances of Adaboost and RF models are higher than those of SVR and ANN. However, the generalization ability and sensitivity to the inputs analyses show that the ANN and SVR models are more generalizable and less sensitive to input variables than Adaboost and RF. Globally, the developed models are valuable in forecasting the irrigation water quality parameters and could help the farmers and decision-makers in managing the irrigation water strategies. The developed approaches in this study have been revealed promising in low-cost and real-time forecast of groundwater quality through the use of physical parameters as input variables.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 101 条
[61]   Effect of ionic strength and clay mineralogy on Na-Ca exchange and the SAR-ESP relationship [J].
Kopittke, P. . M. ;
So, H. B. ;
Menzies, N. W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2006, 57 (05) :626-633
[62]   Impact of water scarcity on spruce and beech forests [J].
Krupkova, Lenka ;
Havrankova, Katerina ;
Krejza, Jan ;
Sedlak, Pavel ;
Marek, Michal V. .
JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (03) :899-909
[63]  
Kubat M., 2017, An introduction to machine learning, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63913-0
[64]  
Kuhn M., 2019, Feature engineering and selection: A practical approach for predictive models, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315108230
[65]   Hybrid decision tree-based machine learning models for short-term water quality prediction [J].
Lu, Hongfang ;
Ma, Xin .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2020, 249
[66]   Network Traffic Anomaly Detection Based on Information Gain and Deep Learning [J].
Lu, Xianglin ;
Liu, Pengju ;
Lin, Jiayi .
PROCEEDINGS OF 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEM AND DATA MINING (ICISDM 2019), 2019, :11-15
[67]   A new proposal of the classification of irrigation water [J].
Maia Meireles, Ana Celia ;
de Andrade, Eunice Maia ;
Guerreiro Chaves, Luiz Carlos ;
Frischkorn, Horst ;
Crisostomo, Lindbergue Araujo .
REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2010, 41 (03) :349-357
[68]  
Mayumi Oshiro Thais, 2012, Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. Proceedings 8th International Conference, MLDM 2012, P154, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_13
[69]   Short-term forecasting of turbidity in trunk main networks [J].
Meyers, Gregory ;
Kapelan, Zoran ;
Keedwell, Edward .
WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 124 :67-76
[70]   Squaring the circle: Agricultural intensification vs. water conservation in Morocco [J].
Molle, Francois ;
Tanouti, Oumaima .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 192 :170-179