A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Two Percent Lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 Epinephrine and Three Percent Mepivacaine in the Intraoral, Infraorbital Nerve Block

被引:18
作者
Berberich, Gerhard [1 ]
Reader, Al [1 ]
Drum, Melissa [1 ]
Nusstein, John [1 ]
Beck, Mike [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Dent, Div Endodont, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Dent, Div Oral Biol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Epinephrine; infraorbital nerve block; lidocaine; maxillary; mepivacaine; ELECTRIC PULP TESTER; MAXILLARY INFILTRATIONS; 2-PERCENT LIDOCAINE; 3-PERCENT MEPIVACAINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2009.08.007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine, and 3% mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block. Methods: Forty subjects randomly received intraoral, infraorbital nerve blocks by using a cartridge of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 or 1:50,000 epinephrine and a cartridge of 3% mepivacaine at 3 separate appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. The anteriors, premolars, and first molar were pulp tested in 4-minute cycles for a total of 60 minutes. Results and Conclusions: The intraoral, infraorbital nerve block was ineffective in providing profound pulpal anesthesia of the maxillary central incisor, lateral incisor, and first molar. Successful pulpal anesthesia of the canine and first and second premolars ranged from 75%-92% by using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine. However, pulpal anesthesia did not last for 60 minutes. The use of 3% mepivacaine provided a shorter duration of anesthesia than the lidocaine formulations with epinephrine in the canines and premolars. (J Endod 2009,35:1498-1504)
引用
收藏
页码:1498 / 1504
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALLEN GD, 1979, DENT ANESTHESIA ANAL, P104
[2]  
BENNETT CR, 1983, MONHEIMS LOCAL ANAES, P76
[3]   Anesthetic efficacy of the palatal-anterior superior alveolar injection [J].
Burns, Y ;
Reader, A ;
Nusstein, J ;
Beck, M ;
Weaver, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 135 (09) :1269-1276
[4]  
Certosimo AJ, 1996, OPER DENT, V21, P25
[5]   ENDODONTIC ANESTHESIA IN MANDIBULAR MOLARS - A CLINICAL-STUDY [J].
COHEN, HP ;
CHA, BY ;
SPANGBERG, LSW .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1993, 19 (07) :370-373
[6]  
COOK W A, 1950, Dent Items Interest, V72, P1021
[7]   AN EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRIC PULP TESTER AS A MEASURE OF ANALGESIA IN HUMAN VITAL TEETH [J].
DREVEN, LJ ;
READER, A ;
BECK, FM ;
MEYERS, WJ ;
WEAVER, J .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1987, 13 (05) :233-238
[8]  
DUBRUL EL, 1980, SICHERS ORAL ANATOMY, P161
[9]   A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations [J].
Evans, Grace ;
Nusstein, John ;
Drum, Melissa ;
Reader, Al ;
Beck, Mike .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2008, 34 (04) :389-393
[10]  
Feige I, 1978, Stomatol DDR, V28, P649