Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Anatomy by Cone-Beam CT Prior to Sinus Floor Elevation

被引:1
作者
Neugebauer, Joerg [1 ]
Ritter, Lutz [1 ]
Mischkowski, Robert A. [1 ]
Dreiseidler, Timo [1 ]
Scherer, Philipp [1 ]
Ketterle, Matthias [1 ]
Rothamel, Daniel [1 ]
Zoeller, Joachim E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Dept Craniomaxillofacial & Plast Surg, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, D-5000 Cologne 41, Germany
关键词
antral septa; cone-beam computed tomography; dental implants; dental radiography; sinus floor elevation; sinus membrane; DIAGNOSTIC QUALITY; SURVIVAL RATES; SCAN ANALYSIS; SEPTA; COMPLICATIONS; AUGMENTATION; MORPHOLOGY; IMPLANTS; DEVICE; PNEUMATIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical complications during sinus floor elevation are frequently caused by septa in the maxillary sinus. In this study, the prevalence of septa was retrospectively determined via three-dimensional imaging to assess the necessity for appropriate imaging prior to sinus floor elevation. Materials and Methods: The cone-beam computed tomography scans of 1,029 consecutive patients were evaluated to assess the prevalence of septa, taking into account patient age and sex as well as the number and orientation of septa and their locations. If septa were present, the height was measured and the orientation was determined. Results: Septa were found in 47% of patients and 33.2% of sinuses. There was no statistical difference in prevalence with respect to age, sex, or side. Most patients with septa showed one septum in one sinus (24.6%); 13.7% showed one septum in each sinus. Other combinations (up to three septa per sinus) were found in 8.7% of patients. Septa were most commonly located in the first molar region (256 septa), followed by the second molar region (225 septa), the third molar region (144), second premolar region (136), the first premolar region (44), and the canine region (5). The mean septal height was 11.7 +/- 6.08 mm for septa in a sagittal orientation (n = 206, 25.3%; maximum height of 37 mm) and 7.3 +/- 5.08 mm for those oriented transversely (n = 608, 74.7%; maximum height of 36 mm). The variance was larger for the sagittal orientation group (37.03 mm) than for transversely oriented septa (25.9 mm). Conclusion: Septa were found in 47% of the patients in this sample. Appropriate imaging prior to performing sinus surgery seems justified, since complications and the success rate of sinus floor elevation are clearly related to the presence of septa. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2010; 25: 258-265
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 265
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Complications of maxillary sinus augmentations in a selective series of patients [J].
Anavi, Yakir ;
Allon, Dror M. ;
Avishai, Gal ;
Calderon, Shlomo .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2008, 106 (01) :34-38
[2]   MODIFICATION OF THE SINUS LIFT PROCEDURE FOR SEPTA IN THE MAXILLARY ANTRUM [J].
BETTS, NJ ;
MILORO, M .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (03) :332-333
[3]  
BOYNE PJ, 1980, J ORAL SURG, V38, P613
[4]   Dental implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcome according to the initial clinical situation and a proposal of defect classification [J].
Chiapasco, Matteo ;
Zaniboni, Marco ;
Rimondini, Lia .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (04) :416-428
[5]   Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation [J].
Del Fabbro, Massimo ;
Rosano, Gabriele ;
Taschieri, Silvio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2008, 116 (06) :497-506
[6]   Septa within the sinus: effect on elevation of the sinus floor [J].
Ella, Bruno ;
Noble, Reynald Da Costa ;
Lauverjat, Yves ;
Sedarat, Cyril ;
Zwetyenga, Narcisse ;
Siberchicot, Francois ;
Caix, Philippe .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 46 (06) :464-467
[7]  
FARHAT FF, 2008, COMPEND CONTIN ED DE, V29, P394
[8]  
Farhat Fred F, 2008, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V29, P388
[9]   Local and systemic conditions potentially compromising osseointegration - Consensus report of Working Group 3 [J].
Flemmig, Thomas F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 :160-162
[10]  
Garg A K, 1999, Implant Dent, V8, P36, DOI 10.1097/00008505-199901000-00004