Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective

被引:116
作者
Ardolino, F. [1 ]
Cardamone, G. F. [1 ]
Parrillo, F. [1 ]
Arena, U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Environm Biol Pharmaceut Sci & Technol, Via A Vivaldi 43, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Biogas upgrading; Membrane separation; Water scrubbing; Chemical absorption; Pressure swing adsorption;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110588
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study reviews and compares the most utilised techniques to obtain high quality biomethane by upgrading biogas from anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Environmental and economic aspects of membrane separation, water scrubbing, chemical absorption with amine solvent, and pressure swing adsorption have been quantified in a life cycle perspective. An attributional environmental Life Cycle Assessment has been implemented with the support of a Material Flow Analysis and in combination with a complementary environmental Life Cycle Costing. The analyses are based on data largely obtained from Italian existing plants but they can be generalised to the whole European Union, as demonstrated by a companion sensitivity analysis. The comparative assessment of the results indicates all the examined options as fully sustainable, also identifying the "win-win" situations. In particular, the membrane separation technique appears to have the best performances, even though in some cases with limited differences. With reference to base case scenarios, this technique shows better results for the respiratory inorganics potential (up to 34%, i.e. up to 328 kg(PM2.5eq)/y), global warming potential (up to 7%, i.e. up to 344t(CO2eq)/y), and non-renewable energy potential (up to 12%, i.e. up to 6400 GJ(primary)/y) as well as for life cycle costs (up to 3.4%, i.e. about 60 k(sic)/y). The performances of the examined techniques appear anyway dependent on site-specific conditions (such as the injection pressure in the gas grid or the existence/amount of local economic incentives) and commercial strategies for the market of interest.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [21] Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology
    Collet, Pierre
    Flottes, Eglantine
    Favre, Alain
    Raynal, Ludovic
    Pierre, Helene
    Capela, Sandra
    Peregrina, Carlos
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 192 : 282 - 295
  • [22] A socio-economic analysis of biomethane in the transport sector: The case of Italy
    D'Adamo, Idiano
    Falcone, Pasquale Marcello
    Ferella, Francesco
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 95 : 102 - 115
  • [23] EC European Commission. Directive (EU), ENG TOC OJ L 2018, V328
  • [24] EC-European Commission, 2015, DIR EU 2015 1513 EUR
  • [25] Ecoinvent, 2016, LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY
  • [26] Environmental life cycle cost assessment: Recycling of hard plastic waste collected at Danish recycling centres
    Faraca, Giorgia
    Martinez-Sanchez, Veronica
    Astrup, Thomas F.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 143 : 299 - 309
  • [27] A techno-economic assessment of biogas upgrading in a developed market
    Ferella, Francesco
    Cucchiella, Federica
    D'Adamo, Idiano
    Gallucci, Katia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 210 : 945 - 957
  • [28] Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment
    Finnveden, Goran
    Hauschild, Michael Z.
    Ekvall, Tomas
    Guinee, Jeroen
    Heijungs, Reinout
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Koehler, Annette
    Pennington, David
    Suh, Sangwon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 91 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [29] Gatti M., 2019, P MATER M 2019 27 28
  • [30] HerAmbiente, 2019, P MATER M 2019 27 28