Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective

被引:129
作者
Ardolino, F. [1 ]
Cardamone, G. F. [1 ]
Parrillo, F. [1 ]
Arena, U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Environm Biol Pharmaceut Sci & Technol, Via A Vivaldi 43, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Biogas upgrading; Membrane separation; Water scrubbing; Chemical absorption; Pressure swing adsorption;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110588
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study reviews and compares the most utilised techniques to obtain high quality biomethane by upgrading biogas from anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Environmental and economic aspects of membrane separation, water scrubbing, chemical absorption with amine solvent, and pressure swing adsorption have been quantified in a life cycle perspective. An attributional environmental Life Cycle Assessment has been implemented with the support of a Material Flow Analysis and in combination with a complementary environmental Life Cycle Costing. The analyses are based on data largely obtained from Italian existing plants but they can be generalised to the whole European Union, as demonstrated by a companion sensitivity analysis. The comparative assessment of the results indicates all the examined options as fully sustainable, also identifying the "win-win" situations. In particular, the membrane separation technique appears to have the best performances, even though in some cases with limited differences. With reference to base case scenarios, this technique shows better results for the respiratory inorganics potential (up to 34%, i.e. up to 328 kg(PM2.5eq)/y), global warming potential (up to 7%, i.e. up to 344t(CO2eq)/y), and non-renewable energy potential (up to 12%, i.e. up to 6400 GJ(primary)/y) as well as for life cycle costs (up to 3.4%, i.e. about 60 k(sic)/y). The performances of the examined techniques appear anyway dependent on site-specific conditions (such as the injection pressure in the gas grid or the existence/amount of local economic incentives) and commercial strategies for the market of interest.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   LCA of biomethane [J].
Adelt, Marius ;
Wolf, Dieter ;
Vogel, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 3 (05) :646-650
[2]   Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives [J].
Angelidaki, Irini ;
Treu, Laura ;
Tsapekos, Panagiotis ;
Luo, Gang ;
Campanaro, Stefano ;
Wenzel, Henrik ;
Kougias, Panagiotis G. .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2018, 36 (02) :452-466
[3]  
[Anonymous], SUST LIQ BIOF
[4]   Biowaste-to-Biomethane: An LCA study on biogas and syngas roads [J].
Ardolino, Filomena ;
Arena, Umberto .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 87 :441-453
[5]   Biowaste-to-biomethane or biowaste-to-energy? An LCA study on anaerobic digestion of organic waste [J].
Ardolino, Filomena ;
Parrillo, Francesco ;
Arena, Umberto .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 :462-476
[6]   A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies [J].
Awe, Olumide Wesley ;
Zhao, Yaqian ;
Nzihou, Ange ;
Minh, Doan Pham ;
Lyczko, Nathalie .
WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2017, 8 (02) :267-283
[7]   Review: recent advances in biogas purifying technologies [J].
Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. ;
Rodriguez-Galan, Monica ;
Vega, Fernando ;
Vilches, Luis F. ;
Navarrete, Benito .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2019, 16 (05) :401-412
[8]   From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context [J].
Barbera, Elena ;
Menegon, Silvia ;
Banzato, Donatella ;
D'Alpaos, Chiara ;
Bertucco, Alberto .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 135 :663-673
[9]   Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations [J].
Basu, Subhankar ;
Khan, Asim L. ;
Cano-Odena, Angels ;
Liu, Chunqing ;
Vankelecom, Ivo F. J. .
CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 2010, 39 (02) :750-768
[10]  
Bauer F, 2013, SGC RAPPORT