Body Image and Cosmesis After Laparoscopic or Open Appendectomy

被引:19
作者
Sucullu, Ilker [1 ]
Filiz, Ali Ilker [1 ]
Canda, Aras Emre [2 ]
Yucel, Ergun [1 ]
Kurt, Yavuz [1 ]
Yildiz, Mehmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Haydarpasa Training Hop, Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Surg, TR-34668 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Manisa State Hosp, Manisa, Turkey
关键词
laparoscopic appendectomy; cosmesis; body image;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bb8db7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Minimally invasive techniques, such its laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), are thought to produce better cosmetic results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the body image and cosmesis of patients after both LA and open appendectomy (OA). Patients and Methods: Between August 2007 and June 2008, Patients Who underwent LA or OA with the diagnosis Of acute appendicitis were invited to participate in the study by filling out the body image questionnaire. Patients with OA who had the Rockey-Davis incision and LA patients who had the operation by 3 trocars (10-mm infraumbilical, 5-mm suprapubic and additional 10 mm left lower quadrant), were included in the study. Results: A total of 38 patients (20 LA 18 OA) participated in the study. The mean incision size for OA was 3.2 cm (range, 2 to 6 cm), and the mean scores from the body image questionnaire (both body image scale and cosmetic scale) were similar for both groups (P > 0.05). No significant complications or changes in self-confidence (preoperative vs. postoperative) were observed in either group (P > 0.05). Conclusions: To our knowledge, there is no study in the literature that evaluates body image and cosmesis using objective methods for LA. Our results showed that LA has no advantage for body image and cosmesis over OA. Furthermore, prospective studies using different tools with a larger sample size are needed to rationalize the use of laparoscopy for appendectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 404
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy conducted intracorporeally with the aid of a transabdominal sling suture
    Ates, Oguz
    Hakguder, Gulce
    Olguner, Mustafa
    Akgur, Feza M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2007, 42 (06) : 1071 - 1074
  • [2] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children - A meta-analysis
    Aziz, O
    Athanasiou, T
    Tekkis, PP
    Purkayastha, S
    Haddow, J
    Malinovski, V
    Paraskeva, P
    Darzi, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [3] CANDA AE, HOSP EXPERIENCE BODY
  • [4] Needlescopic appendectomy - Too much of a good thing?
    Chock, A
    Seslar, S
    Stoopen, E
    Tristan, A
    Hashish, H
    Gonzalez, JJ
    Franklin, ME
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (09): : 1451 - 1453
  • [5] A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy
    Chung, RS
    Rowland, DY
    Li, P
    Diaz, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [6] Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease
    Dunker, MS
    Stiggelbout, AM
    van Hogezand, RA
    Ringers, J
    Griffioen, G
    Bemelman, WA
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (11): : 1334 - 1340
  • [7] Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy - A comparative study
    Dunker, MS
    Bemelman, WA
    Slors, JFM
    van Duijvendijk, P
    Gouma, DJ
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (12) : 1800 - 1807
  • [8] Hay SA, 1998, PEDIATR SURG INT, V13, P21
  • [9] HEBEBRAND D, 1994, CHIRURG, V65, P112
  • [10] Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
    Hellberg, A
    Rudberg, C
    Kullman, E
    Enochsson, L
    Fenyö, G
    Graffner, H
    Hallerbäck, B
    Johansson, B
    Anderberg, B
    Wenner, J
    Ringqvist, I
    Sörensen, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (01) : 48 - 53