Is PET-CT an accurate method for the differential diagnosis between chondroma and chondrosarcoma?

被引:32
作者
Jesus-Garcia, Reynaldo [1 ]
Osawa, Akemi [2 ]
Filippi, Renee Zon [3 ]
Maia Viola, Dan Carai [1 ]
Korukian, Marcos [1 ]
Campos Neto, Guilherme de Carvalho [2 ]
Wagner, Jairo [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Orthoped Oncol Dept, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Dept Nucl Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Dept Surg Pathol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Cartilage; Neoplasm; PET-CT; Bone tumors; Chondroma; Chondrosarcoma; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; MALIGNANT CARTILAGE TUMORS; FDG-PET; THEORETICAL BASIS; CLINICAL BIOLOGY; BONE; BENIGN; EMPHASIS; LESIONS; RADIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s40064-016-1782-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The differential diagnosis between chondroma and intraosseous chondrosarcoma is based on imaging and clinical exams, but only a biopsy can confirm diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of PET-CT in differentially diagnosing chondroma and chondrosarcoma. From October 2009 to May 2015, 36 patients with cartilaginous bone lesions in the extremities, 12 (33.3 %) men and 24 (66.6 %) women, were prospectively included in the study. Patients ranged in age from 21 to 68 years, with a mean age of 44 years. Lesions were located in the long bones: in the proximal humerus in 26 (72.2 %) patients, in the femoral shaft in 1 (2.7 %), in the distal femur in 7 (19.4 %), and in the proximal tibia in 2 (5.5 %). The SUVmax value of 2.0 was used to separate between patients submitted to surgery and patients submitted to observation. Among the 36 patients studied, 17 (47.2 %) had SUVmax <= 2.0, and they were diagnosed as chondroma and they were treated conservatively. Follow-up ranged from 14 to 76 months, averaging 38 months. Nineteen (52.7 %) patients with SUVmax > 2.0 were diagnosed as chondrosarcoma and underwent surgery. The area of the curve, calculated considering the SUV variable as numeric, is estimated in 0.966, with a 95 % confidence interval from 0.906 to 1.000. To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and positive/negative predictive values, it was built a 2 x 2 table. Significance was set at p < 0.05. According the criteria of maximum sensitivity and specificity, the cut point suggested to SUVmax was 2.2. If we consider this point, it is possible to identify 19 of 36 positive cases to chondroma (52.8 %), it means, all chondrosarcomas of the series. We concluded that PET-CT can be used as an objective and quantitative method of differentiating between chondromas and chondrosarcomas located within the long bones. It represents a complementary examination to standard imaging (X-ray, scintigraphy, CT and MRI) and pathological exams. The SUVmax between 2.0 and 2.2 would be a range area between chondroma and chondrosarcoma and this range can be of value, among others exams, in decide the best treatment for patients with cartilaginous lesions in long bones. Level of evidence Level I-diagnostic study-prospectively investigating a diagnostic test using a universally applied "gold" standard.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Grade of Preoperative Biopsy Compared to Surgical Excision in Chondrosarcoma of the Long Bones [J].
Jennings, Robert ;
Riley, Nicholas ;
Rose, Barry ;
Rossi, Roberto ;
Skinner, John A. ;
Cannon, Steven R. ;
Briggs, Timothy W. R. ;
Pollock, Rob ;
Saifuddin, Asif .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 2010
[22]   Reliability of histopathologic and radiologic grading of cartilaginous neoplasms in long bones [J].
Jones, Kevin B. ;
Buckwalter, Joseph A. ;
DeYoung, Barry R. ;
El-Khoury, Georges Y. ;
Dolan, Lori ;
DeYoung, Barry R. ;
Gannon, Francis H. ;
Inwards, Carrie Y. ;
Klein, Michael J. ;
Kyriakos, Michael ;
McCarthy, Edward F. ;
Siegal, Gene P. ;
Unni, K. Krishnan ;
El-Khoury, Georges Y. ;
Fayad, Laura ;
Kransdorf, Mark J. ;
Murphey, Mark D. ;
Panicek, David M. ;
Rubin, David A. ;
Sundaram, Murali ;
Vanel, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (10) :2113-2123
[23]  
KERN KA, 1988, J NUCL MED, V29, P181
[24]  
Kumar R V, 1993, Indian J Pathol Microbiol, V36, P436
[25]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[26]   Chondrosarcoma of bone: An assessment of outcome [J].
Lee, FY ;
Mankin, HJ ;
Fondren, G ;
Gebhardt, MC ;
Springfield, DS ;
Rosenberg, AE ;
Jennings, LC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (03) :326-338
[27]   THE HAZARDS OF BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT PRIMARY BONE AND SOFT-TISSUE TUMORS [J].
MANKIN, HJ ;
LANGE, TA ;
SPANIER, SS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1982, 64 (08) :1121-1127
[28]  
Mankin HJ, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V450, P4
[29]  
OLSZEWSKI W, 1983, ACTA CYTOL, V27, P345
[30]   Integrated PET/CT in Evaluating Sarcomatous Transformation in Osteochondromas [J].
Purandare, Nilendu C. ;
Rangarajan, Venkatesh ;
Agarwal, Manish ;
Sharma, Anshu Rajnish ;
Shah, Sneha ;
Arora, Abhishek ;
Parasar, Deep Shankar .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 34 (06) :350-354