Comparative Analysis of Aerodynamic Characteristics of F16 and F22 Combat Aircraft using Computational Fluid Dynamics

被引:25
作者
Malik, Lohit [1 ]
Tevatia, Abhishek [1 ]
机构
[1] Netaji Subhas Univ Technol, New Delhi 110078, India
关键词
Lockheed Martin F16 raptor; General dynamics F22 flying Falcon; Computational fluid dynamics; Temperature and pressure variation; Shear stress distribution; Nosecone investigation; CFD; AEROSPACE; FLOWS;
D O I
10.14429/dsj.71.15762
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper presents the computational investigation of air flow over an aircraft at realistic speeds while demonstrating the importance of extending the existing analysis to the complete airplane and how pivotal it is in improving its in-flight performance. The study is done for F16 and F22 aircraft using ANSYS Fluent (19.2) to obtain pressure distribution, shear stress distribution and temperature variation on the complete surface of the aircraft. Since the front section of the aircraft is prone to direct initial impact of surrounding environment, this portion is also examined. Here, as the speed is doubled from Mach 1 to Mach 2, a rise in the value of all the three variables is noticed for the F16 aircraft, whereas the pressure distribution for F22 aircraft shows strange behaviour for the highest speed (Mach 2). On comparing the results over the whole surface, it is seen that F16 experiences smaller pressure (29% lower for Mach 1 and 30% for Mach 2), temperature (9.5% lower for Mach 1 and 30% for Mach 2) and shear stress relative to F22 and the stress shows a huge change (90% lower for Mach 1 and 83% for Mach 2). Results of the present study imply that the design of the aircraft highly influences its performance as the parameters discussed touch their limits.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 145
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Abbott I. H., THEORY WING SECTIONS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, INT J INNOV SCI ENG
  • [3] CFD analysis of the flow around the X-31 aircraft at high angle of attack
    Boelens, O. J.
    [J]. AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 20 (01) : 38 - 51
  • [4] Reduced-order modeling of transonic flows around an airfoil submitted to small deformations
    Bourguet, Remi
    Braza, Marianna
    Dervieux, Alain
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2011, 230 (01) : 159 - 184
  • [5] Aerodynamics and Conceptual Design Studies on an Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Configuration
    Cummings, Russell M.
    Liersch, Carsten M.
    Schuette, Andreas
    Huber, Kerstin C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2018, 55 (02): : 454 - 474
  • [6] Da Ronch A., AIAA20104817
  • [7] Dash A., 2016, MECH CIVIL ENG, V13, P18
  • [8] Progress and future prospects of CFD in aerospace - Wind tunnel and beyond
    Fujii, K
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2005, 41 (06) : 455 - 470
  • [9] TRANSONIC UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC AND AEROELASTIC CALCULATIONS ABOUT AIRFOILS AND WINGS
    GOORJIAN, PM
    GURUSWAMY, GP
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1988, 30 (04) : 929 - 936
  • [10] Gore K., 2018, INT RES J ENG TECHNO, V5, P639