Rebound effect of improved energy efficiency for different energy types: A general equilibrium analysis for China

被引:73
作者
Lu, Yingying [1 ]
Liu, Yu [2 ]
Zhou, Meifang [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Ctr Res Ind Econ, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Policy & Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Rebound effect; Energy efficiency policy; China; CGE model; ECONOMY; SUBSTITUTION; CONSUMPTION; DEMAND; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the rebound effect of different energy types in China based on a static computable general equilibrium model. A one-off 5% energy efficiency improvement is imposed on five different types of energy, respectively, in all the 135 production sectors in China. The rebound effect is measured both on the production level and on the economy-wide level for each type of energy. The results show that improving energy efficiency of using electricity has the largest positive impact on GDP among the five energy types. Inter-fuel substitutability does not affect the macroeconomic results significantly, but long-run impact is usually greater than the short-run impact. For the exports-oriented sectors, those that are capital-intensive get big negative shock in the short run while those that are labour-intensive get hurt in the long run. There is no "backfire" effect; however, improving efficiency of using electricity can cause negative rebound, which implies that improving the energy efficiency of using electricity might be a good policy choice under China's current energy structure. In general, macro-level rebound is larger than production-level rebound. Primary energy goods show larger rebound effect than secondary energy goods. In addition, the paper points out that the policy makers in China should look at the rebound effect in the long term rather than in the short term. The energy efficiency policy would be a good and effective policy choice for energy conservation in China when it still has small inter-fuel substitution. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 256
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[31]   Fuel conserving (and using) production functions [J].
Saunders, Harry D. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (05) :2184-2235
[32]   A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes [J].
Saunders, HD .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :439-449
[33]   THE EFFECTS OF AN INCREASE IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY ON THE KENYAN ECONOMY [J].
SEMBOJA, HHH .
ENERGY POLICY, 1994, 22 (03) :217-225
[34]   Using latent variable approach to estimate China's economy-wide energy rebound effect over 1954-2010 [J].
Shao, Shuai ;
Huang, Tao ;
Yang, Lili .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 72 :235-248
[35]   INTERFUEL SUBSTITUTION: A META-ANALYSIS [J].
Stern, David I. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2012, 26 (02) :307-331
[36]   "Rebound" Effects from Increased Energy Efficiency: A Time to Pause and Reflect [J].
Turner, Karen .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (04) :25-42
[37]   Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy [J].
Turner, Karen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (05) :648-666
[38]   Energy Conservation More Effective With Rebound Policy [J].
van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (01) :43-58
[39]   The foundations of the environmental rebound effect and its contribution towards a general framework [J].
Vivanco, David Font ;
McDowall, Will ;
Freire-Gonzalez, Jaume ;
Kemp, Rene ;
van der Voet, Ester .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 125 :60-69
[40]   An empirical study of direct rebound effect for passenger transport in urban China [J].
Wang, H. ;
Zhou, P. ;
Zhou, D. Q. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (02) :452-460