Assessing operational impacts of automation using functional resonance analysis method

被引:11
作者
Ferreira, Pedro N. P. [1 ,2 ]
Juan Canas, Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Marine Technol & Ocean Engn, Ave Rovisco Pais, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Granada, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Granada, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Human-automation interactions; Uncertainty and variability; Interdependency and complexity; AIR-TRAFFIC-CONTROL; COMPLEXITY; SYSTEMS; SAFETY; PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10111-019-00540-z
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Interaction with automated systems and other types of technologies seems inevitable and almost a requirement of human work. The aviation sector, and in particular air traffic control, is devoting considerable efforts towards automation, to respond to the increased demand for capacity. Project AUTOPACE investigated the impacts of foreseeable automation over human performance and behaviour. The purpose was to identify new training requirements for air traffic controllers under foreseeable automation scenarios. In addition to the research carried out under the remit of AUTOPACE, the functional resonance analysis method was used to explore how the interactions between human operators and technology may change, as new automation features would be introduced into ATC operations. The FRAM model was developed based on AUTOPACE concept of operations, two levels of automation (E2 and E1) and was then used to instantiate three different non-nominal situations that were also investigated by the project. This paper presents the FRAM-based analysis carried out and discusses the potential impacts of automation, considering uncertainty and variability as two critical aspects that emerge from complex operation scenarios. The relation with AUTOPACE work is continuously established and the added value of FRAM for the pursuit of further AUTOPACE work is argued.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 552
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts
[2]  
AUTOPACE, 2017, DEL D3 1 ATCO PSYCH
[3]  
AUTOPACE, 2017, DEL D3 2 COMP TRAIN
[4]  
AUTOPACE, 2016, DEL D2 1 FUT AUT SCE
[5]   IRONIES OF AUTOMATION [J].
BAINBRIDGE, L .
AUTOMATICA, 1983, 19 (06) :775-779
[6]   Development of design principles for automated systems in transport control [J].
Balfe, Nora ;
Wilson, John R. ;
Sharples, Sarah ;
Clarke, Theresa .
ERGONOMICS, 2012, 55 (01) :37-54
[7]   An analysis of relational complexity in an air traffic control conflict detection task [J].
Boag, Christine ;
Neal, Andrew ;
Loft, Shayne ;
Halford, Graeme S. .
ERGONOMICS, 2006, 49 (14) :1508-1526
[8]  
Burdea GC, 2017, VIRTUAL REALITY TECH
[9]  
Canas JJ, 2018, 2 INT S HUM MENT WOR
[10]  
Christoffersen K, 2002, ADV HUM PER, V2, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1479-3601(02)02003-9