Multiple attribute decision-making methods for the dynamic operator allocation problem

被引:65
作者
Yang, Taho
Chen, Mu-Chen
Hung, Chih-Ching
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Mfg Engn, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Business Management, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
AHP; fuzzy set theory; integrated circuit packaging; multiple attribute decision making; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matcom.2006.04.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study explores two multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) methods to solve a dynamic operator allocation problem. Both methods use an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine attribute weights a priori. The first method uses a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The second method incorporates a fuzzy-based logic that uses linguistic variable representation, fuzzy operation, and fuzzy defuzzification. The TOPSIS uses deterministic performance ratings and attribute weights, whilst the fuzzy-based is a linguistic method. An applied case study drawn from existing literature is used to demonstrate and test findings. The proposed methods systematically evaluate alternative scenarios, with the result indicating promise for solving an operator allocation decision problem. (c) 2006 IMACS. Published by Elsevier BX All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 299
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Bellman R. E., 1971, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
  • [2] ON A SHORT-COMING OF SAATY METHOD OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES
    BELTON, V
    GEAR, T
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 11 (03): : 228 - 230
  • [3] Static and dynamic operator allocation problems in cellular manufacturing systems
    Bhaskar, K
    Srinivasan, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1997, 35 (12) : 3467 - 3481
  • [4] Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation
    Cheng, CH
    Lin, Y
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (01) : 174 - 186
  • [5] Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers
    Cheng, CH
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1999, 107 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [6] *EXP CHOIC INC, 2002, EXP CHOIC US GUID
  • [7] Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scale
    Finan, JS
    Hurley, WJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 112 (02) : 367 - 372
  • [8] Hwang C. L., 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
  • [9] Jang J-S.R., 1997, NEUROFUZZY SOFT COMP
  • [10] Kaufmann A., 1991, Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications