A soft-landing waveform for actuation of a single-pole single-throw ohmic RF MEMS switch

被引:76
作者
Czaplewski, David A.
Dyck, Christopher W.
Sumali, Hartono
Massad, Jordan E.
Kuppers, Jaron D.
Reines, Isak
Cowan, William D.
Tigges, Christopher P.
机构
[1] Sandia Natl Labs, MEMS Devices & Reliabil Phys, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[2] Sandia Natl Labs, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS; SURFACE; CONTACTS; SILICON; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1109/JMEMS.2006.883576
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A soft-landing actuation waveform was designed to reduce the bounce of a single-pole single-throw (SPST) ohmic radio frequency (RF) microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) switch during actuation. The waveform consisted of an actuation voltage pulse, a coast time, and a hold voltage. The actuation voltage pulse had a short duration relative to the transition time of the switch and imparted the kinetic energy necessary to close the switch. After the actuation pulse was stopped, damping and restoring forces slowed the switch to near-zero velocity as it approached the closed position. This is referred to as the coast time. The hold voltage was applied upon reaching closure to keep the switch from opening. An ideal waveform would close the switch with near zero impact velocity. The switch dynamics resulting from an ideal waveform were modeled using finite element methods and measured using laser Doppler vibrometry. The ideal waveform closed the switch with an impact velocity of less than 3 cm/s without rebound. Variations in the soft-landing waveform closed the switch with impact velocities of 12.5 cm/s with rebound amplitudes ranging from 75 to 150 nm compared to impact velocities of 22.5 cm/s and rebound amplitudes of 150 to 200 nm for a step waveform. The ideal waveform closed the switch faster than a simple step voltage actuation because there was no rebound and it reduced the impact force imparted on the contacting surfaces upon closure.
引用
收藏
页码:1586 / 1594
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], P INT C MEMS NANO SM
  • [2] BHARDWAJ M, 2002, P SUP 2002 BALT MD N
  • [3] Open-loop versus closed-loop control of MEMS devices: choices and issues
    Borovic, B
    Liu, AQ
    Popa, D
    Cai, H
    Lewis, FL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROMECHANICS AND MICROENGINEERING, 2005, 15 (10) : 1917 - 1924
  • [4] Surface micromachining for microelectromechanical systems
    Bustillo, JM
    Howe, RT
    Muller, RS
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1998, 86 (08) : 1552 - 1574
  • [5] Fabrication and characterization of ohmic contacting RF MEMS switches
    Dyck, CW
    Plut, TA
    Nordquist, CD
    Finnegan, PS
    Austin, F
    Reines, I
    Goldsmith, C
    [J]. MEMS/MOEMS COMPONENTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2004, 5344 : 79 - 88
  • [6] EPP DS, 2005, SOC EXP MECH P 15 IN
  • [7] ORGANIC DEPOSITS ON PRECIOUS METAL CONTACTS
    HERMANCE, HW
    EGAN, TF
    [J]. BELL SYSTEM TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1958, 37 (03): : 739 - 776
  • [8] Review of radio frequency microelectromechanical systems technology
    Lucyszyn, S
    [J]. IEE PROCEEDINGS-SCIENCE MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 151 (02) : 93 - 103
  • [9] MITCHELL JA, 2001, 1 MIT C COMP FLUID S
  • [10] RESONANT GATE TRANSISTOR
    NATHANSON, HC
    NEWELL, WE
    WICKSTROM, RA
    DAVIS, JR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1967, ED14 (03) : 117 - +