Significance of Renal Rim Grade on Computed Tomography in Severity Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis

被引:10
作者
Imamura, Yu [1 ]
Hirota, Masahiko [1 ]
Ida, Satoshi [1 ]
Hayashi, Naoko [1 ]
Watanabe, Masayuki [1 ]
Takamori, Hiroshi [1 ]
Awai, Kazuo [2 ]
Baba, Hideo [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
关键词
acute pancreatitis; computed tomography (CT); Gerota fascia; renal rim grade; renal rim sign; loss of renal rim sign; APACHE-II; CT; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTOR; DIAGNOSIS; SYSTEM; INDEX;
D O I
10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181b9b4e9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Multifactor scoring systems, such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, are useful for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP); however, they are rather complicated. The aim of this study was to introduce renal rim grade (RRG) as a severity assessment measure for AP. Methods: One hundred twenty-two eligible AP patients who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) on admission were evaluated for RRG (grades 1-3). The end points were the severity of illness and hospital mortality. Furthermore, RRG was compared with the Balthazar score, the CT severity index, the Ranson score, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, using a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: The exacerbation rates into severe disease were 3% (grade 1), 48% (grade 2), and 89% (grade 3). The mortality rates were 3% (grade 1), 8% (grade 2), and 31% (grade 3). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves to predict the severe disease and mortality using the RRG system were comparable with other scoring systems. Conclusions: Renal rim grade is useful for the evaluation of the severity of AP.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Interfascial and perinephric pathways in the spread of retroperitoneal disease: Refined concepts based on CT observations [J].
Aizenstein, RI ;
Wilbur, AC ;
ONeil, HK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (03) :639-643
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, V13 Suppl 4, pS1
[3]   ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CT [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
RANSON, JHC ;
NAIDICH, DP ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
CACCAVALE, R ;
COOPER, MM .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (03) :767-772
[4]   ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - VALUE OF CT IN ESTABLISHING PROGNOSIS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
ROBINSON, DL ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
RANSON, JHC .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) :331-336
[5]   Acute pancreatitis: Assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation [J].
Balthazar, EJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (03) :603-613
[6]   Severe acute pancreatitis: Clinical course and management [J].
Beger, Hans G. ;
Rau, Bettina M. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 13 (38) :5043-5051
[7]  
BRADLEY EL, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P586
[8]   Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II and III scoring systems in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome [J].
Chatzicostas, C ;
Roussomoustakaki, M ;
Vardas, E ;
Romanos, J ;
Kouroumalis, EA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 36 (03) :253-260
[9]   Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis - Evaluation of a new scoring system [J].
De Waele, Jan J. ;
Delrue, Louke ;
Hoste, Eric A. ;
De Vos, Martine ;
Duyck, Philippe ;
Colardyn, Francis A. .
PANCREAS, 2007, 34 (02) :185-190
[10]  
Dervenis C, 1999, INT J PANCREATOL, V25, P195