Agroforestry transitions: The good, the bad and the ugly

被引:56
作者
Ollinaho, Ossi I. [1 ]
Kroger, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Global Dev Studies, Fac Social Sci, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci HELSUS,Global Extra, Yliopistonkatu 3, Helsinki 00014, Yliopisto, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Agroforestry; Agroecology; Sustainable development; Deforestation; Rural transitions; Political economy; LAND-USE SYSTEM; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; POLITICAL ECOLOGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MINAS-GERAIS; SOIL QUALITY; ADOPTION; AGROECOLOGY; AGRICULTURE; WORLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.016
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This article canvasses the current definitions and framings of ?agroforestry? in different academic literature and policies. Three key framings of ?agroforestry? are identified in the scholarship and explored for their differences. The findings suggest that the distinct schools of research on ?agroforestry? focus on distinct points of departure, and these baseline situations from which transitions to what is called ?agroforestry? occur vary in distinct ways from monoculture plantations to primary forests. Political-economic analysis is used to scrutinize three key ?agroforestry? transition categories: agroecological, agribusiness, and forest degradation, which the article identifies as agroecoforestry (the good), agrobizforestry (the bad), and agrodeforestry (the ugly) transitions, respectively. Examples of each type are provided based on field research in Brazil, and the results are put into a global perspective. The categories are helpful in identifying the ?agroforestry? transitions that are currently marketed as good solutions but might also have negative impacts and in highlighting the agroecological agroforestry transitions that would help simultaneously increase global food production, adapt to and mitigate the climate crisis, and achieve equity and social justice.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 221
页数:12
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]   Agroforestry: a sustainable environmental practice for carbon sequestration under the climate change scenarios-a review [J].
Abbas, Farhat ;
Hammad, Hafiz Mohkum ;
Fahad, Shah ;
Cerda, Artemi ;
Rizwan, Muhammad ;
Farhad, Wajid ;
Ehsan, Sana ;
Bakhat, Hafiz Faiq .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (12) :11177-11191
[2]  
Agevi H., 2017, TROP SUBTROP AGROECO, V20, P101
[3]   World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development [J].
Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2008, 39 (06) :1145-1161
[4]   Anything but a story foretold: multiple politics of resistance to the agrarian extractivist project in Guatemala [J].
Alonso-Fradejas, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2015, 42 (3-4) :489-515
[5]  
Altieri M.A., 2005, AGROECOLOGY SEARCH T
[7]   Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agriculture [J].
Altieri, Miguel A. ;
Nicholls, Clara I. .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2020, 47 (05) :881-898
[9]  
Andreucci D., 2017, Capitalism Nature Socialism, V28, P28, DOI [10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027, DOI 10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027]
[10]   Agricultural technology and forests: A recapitulation [J].
Angelsen, A ;
Kaimowitz, D .
AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES AND TROPICAL DEFORESTATION, 2001, :383-402