Application of flame arrester in mitigation of explosion and flame deflagration of ventilation air methane

被引:26
作者
AL-Zuraiji, Mohammed J. Ajrash [1 ]
Zanganeha, Jafar [1 ]
Moghtaderi, Behdad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Sch Engn, Frontier Energy Technol Ctr,Chem Engn, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
Flame arrester; Mitigation; Flame; Countermeasures; Explosion; Ventilation air methane; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; HYBRID FUEL; COAL DUSTS; PROTECTION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115985
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Fugitive methane emissions from underground coal mines are considered a potent greenhouse gas source with a large global warming potential. Application of ventilation air methane thermal oxidiser technology reduces this risk to a large extent. However, it imposes the risk of accidental fires and explosions in the mine site which may claim many lives and cause massive property damage. As such, the necessity of employing safety barriers such as flame arrester seems crucial to protect the mine against the accidental flames and explosion propagation originated from the thermal oxidiser. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of an inline flame arrester for the mitigation of methane explosions in a large scale detonation tube. The results corresponding to this study indicated that the flame arrester was capable to effectively mitigate the explosion flames of 5%, 7.5% and 9.5% methane air mixtures (for a 10 m fuel filled section). The flame arrester reduced the pressure wave velocity by 88% and 40% for the explosions of methane-air mixtures of 7.5% and 9.5% methane, respectively. The flame propagation velocities for the 7.5% and 9.5% methane concentrations reduced approximately 32% and 44%, respectively. A significant pressure build-up was observed upstream of the flame arrester when compared with a duct without flame arrester. In addition, the build-up pressure was relatively higher for larger methane concentrations (e.g. 9.5%). These observations highlights that the maximum design pressure of an industrial process plant must be carefully considered when implementing an inline flame arrester due to the possibility of a sudden pressure increase cause by an explosion.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Ajrash MJ, 2017, ENERGY FUELS
[2]  
Ajrash MJ, 2017, J HAZARD MAT
[3]   Deflagration of premixed methane-air in a large scale detonation tube [J].
Ajrash, Mohammed J. ;
Zanganeh, Jafar ;
Moghtaderi, Behdad .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2017, 109 :374-386
[4]   Impact of suspended coal dusts on methane deflagration properties in a large-scale straight duct [J].
Ajrash, Mohammed J. ;
Zanganeh, Jafar ;
Moghtaderi, Behdad .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2017, 338 :334-342
[5]   The flame deflagration of hybrid methane coal dusts in a large-scale detonation tube (LSDT) [J].
Ajrash, Mohammed J. ;
Zanganeh, Jafar ;
Moghtaderi, Behdad .
FUEL, 2017, 194 :491-502
[6]   Methane-coal dust hybrid fuel explosion properties in a large scale cylindrical explosion chamber [J].
Ajrash, Mohammed Jabbar ;
Zanganeh, Jafar ;
Moghtaderi, Behdad .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 40 :317-328
[7]   Effects of ignition energy on fire and explosion characteristics of dilute hybrid fuel in ventilation air methane [J].
Ajrash, Mohammed Jabbar ;
Zanganeh, Jafar ;
Moghtaderi, Behdad .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 40 :207-216
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 128742001 BS EN
[9]   Using maximum experimental safe gap to select flame arresters [J].
Britton, LG .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2000, 19 (03) :140-145
[10]  
Broschka GL, 1983, Plant/ Oper Prog, V2, P5, DOI [10.1002/prsb.720020104, DOI 10.1002/PRSB.720020104]