Developing a 3D mineral texture quantification method of drill core for geometallurgy

被引:6
作者
Voigt, M. J. [1 ,2 ]
Miller, J. [3 ]
Bbosa, L. [1 ]
Govender, R. A. [5 ]
Bradshaw, D. [4 ]
Mainza, A. [1 ]
Becker, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Ctr Minerals Res, Rondebosch, South Africa
[2] Council Geosci, Econ Geol Competency, Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Matieland, South Africa
[4] Univ Cape Town, Minerals Met Initiat, Rondebosch, South Africa
[5] Univ Cape Town, Blast Impact & Survivabil Res Unit, Rondebosch, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
drill core; mineral texture; ore variability; RAY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; INDEX; TOOL;
D O I
10.17159/2411-9717/590/2019
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Mineral texture is a critical factor which controls ore variability and is an important attribute in geometallurgy. In relation to downstream processes, it affects the fracture pattern during breakage, where rock strength is inherently a function of mineral texture. Because of the subjective nature of mineral texture, it has not been easy to quantify, especially in the context of a measurement suitable for use in geometallurgical programmes. The aim of this paper is to present the first steps in developing a 3D mineral texture quantification method for drill core and to assess its sensitivity to differences in rock strength using a case study. The methodology includes classifying the textural information using the 3D grey level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) and X- ray computed tomography (XCT) coupled method. Rock strength tests were performed using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). The case study investigates a heterogeneous polymetallic sulphide deposit and a homogeneous shale subdivided into three 'mineral textural types'. The variability is largely captured by the GLCM matrices, and preliminary trends can be observed where the shale is finer grained and has a higher yield strength in comparison with the coarser grained polymetallic sulphide ore.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 353
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Bam L.C., 2016, P 3 AUSIMM INT GEOM
[2]   Ore characterization, process mineralogy and lab automation a roadmap for future mining [J].
Baum, W. .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2014, 60 :69-73
[3]  
Bbosa L., 2007, THESIS
[4]  
Becker M., 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3, P15
[5]  
Craig J.R., 1994, Ore microscopy and Ore petrography, V2nd, P331
[6]   Quantifying mineral grain size distributions for process modelling using X-ray micro-tomography [J].
Evans, C. L. ;
Wightman, E. M. ;
Yuan, X. .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2015, 82 :78-83
[7]   THE ORE TEXTURES OF THE NEVES-CORVO VOLCANOGENIC MASSIVE SULFIDES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR ORE BENEFICIATION [J].
GASPAR, O ;
PINTO, A .
MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE, 1991, 55 (380) :417-&
[8]   Investigation of the effect of mineralogy as rate-limiting factors in large particle leaching [J].
Ghorbani, Yousef ;
Becker, Megan ;
Petersen, Jochen ;
Mainza, Aubrey N. ;
Franzidis, Jean-Paul .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2013, 52 :38-51
[9]   Use of X-ray computed tomography to investigate crack distribution and mineral dissemination in sphalerite ore particles [J].
Ghorbani, Yousef ;
Becker, Megan ;
Petersen, Jochen ;
Morar, Sameer H. ;
Mainza, Aubrey ;
Franzidis, J. -P. .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2011, 24 (12) :1249-1257
[10]   Using quantitative electron microscopy for process mineralogy applications [J].
Gottlieb, P ;
Wilkie, G ;
Sutherland, D ;
Ho-Tun, E ;
Suthers, S ;
Perera, K ;
Jenkins, B ;
Spencer, S ;
Butcher, A ;
Rayner, J .
JOM-JOURNAL OF THE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY, 2000, 52 (04) :24-25