Automatic differentiation for electromagnetic models used in optimization

被引:13
作者
Enciu, P. [1 ]
Wurtz, F. [1 ]
Gerbaud, L. [1 ]
Delinchant, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lab Genie Elect Grenoble GZE Lab, St Martin Dheres, France
关键词
Gradient methods; Constraint handling; Optimization techniques; Computer software; Electromagnetism; Modelling;
D O I
10.1108/03321640910969557
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to illustrate automatic differentiation (AD) as a new technology for the device sizing in electromagnetism by using gradient constrained optimization. Component architecture for the design of engineering systems (CADES) framework, previously described, is presented here with extended features. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is subject to further usage for optimization of AD (also named algorithmic differentiation) which is a powerful technique that computes derivatives of functions described as computer programs in a programming language like C/C++, FORTRAN. Findings - Indeed, analytical modeling is well suited regarding optimization procedure, but the modeling of complex devices needs sometimes numerical formulations. This paper then reviews the concepts implemented in CA-DES which aim to manage the interactions of analytical and numerical modeling inside of gradient-based optimization procedure. Finally, the paper shows that AD has no limit for the input program complexity, or gradients accuracy, in the context of constrained optimization of an electromagnetic actuator. Originality/value - AD is employed for a large and complex numerical code computing multidimensional integrals of functions. Thus, the paper intends to prove the AD capabilities in the context of electromagnetic device sizing by means of gradient optimization. The code complexity as also as the implications of AD usage may stand as a good reference for the researchers in this field area.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / 1326
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FRONTIERS APPL MATH
[2]  
Bendtsen C., 1996, FADBAD, a Flexible C++ Package for Automatic Differentiation
[3]   Adifor 2.0: Automatic differentiation of Fortran 77 programs [J].
Bischof, C ;
Khademi, P ;
Mauer, A ;
Carle, A .
IEEE COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 1996, 3 (03) :18-32
[4]  
BISCHOF CH, 1997, ADIC EXTENSIBLE AUTO
[5]  
BUCKER M, 2000, AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTI
[6]   Deformable magnetic mirror for adaptive optics: technological aspects [J].
Cugat, O ;
Basrour, S ;
Divoux, C ;
Mounaix, P ;
Reyne, G .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2001, 89 (1-2) :1-9
[7]   An optimizer using the software component paradigm for the optimization of engineering systems [J].
Delinchant, B. ;
Duret, D. ;
Estrabaut, L. ;
Gerbaud, L. ;
Huu, H. Nguyen ;
Du Peloux, B. ;
Rakotoarison, H. L. ;
Verdiere, F. ;
Wurtz, F. .
COMPEL-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATION AND MATHEMATICS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2007, 26 (02) :368-379
[8]   Reducing sensitivity analysis time-cost of compound model [J].
Delinchant, B ;
Wurtz, F ;
Atienza, E .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2004, 40 (02) :1216-1219
[9]   Two Levels Modeling for the Optimization of Electromagnetic Actuators [J].
Delinchant, B. ;
Gruosso, G. ;
Wurtz, F. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2009, 45 (03) :1724-1727
[10]  
DEMEDEIROS LH, 1998, IEEE T MAGNETICS, V34