Characteristics of patients with chronic back pain who benefit from acupuncture

被引:39
作者
Sherman, Karen J. [1 ]
Cherkin, Daniel C. [1 ]
Ichikawa, Laura [1 ]
Avins, Andrew L. [2 ]
Barlow, William E. [1 ,3 ]
Khalsa, Partap S. [4 ]
Deyo, Richard A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[2] No Calif Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Canc Res & Biostat, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Natl Ctr Complementary & Alternat Med, Div Extramural Res & Training, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Family Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
CLINICAL-PREDICTION; PRIMARY-CARE; TRIAL; DIAGNOSIS; EXPENDITURES; EXPECTATIONS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-10-114
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although many clinicians believe there are clinically important subgroups of persons with "non-specific" low back pain, such subgroups have not yet been clearly identified. As part of a large trial evaluating acupuncture for chronic low back pain, we sought to identify subgroups of participants that were particularly responsive to acupuncture. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data for the 638 participants in our clinical trial comparing different types of acupuncture to usual care to identify baseline characteristics that predicted responses to individualized, standardized, or simulated acupuncture treatments. After identifying factors that predicted improvements in back-related function or symptoms, we determined if these factors were more likely to predict improvement for those receiving the acupuncture treatments than for those receiving usual care. This was accomplished by testing for an interaction between the prognostic factors and treatment group in four models: functional outcomes (measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Scale) at 8 and 52 weeks post-randomization and symptom outcomes (measured with a numerical rating scale) at 8 and 52 weeks. Results: Overall, the strongest predictors of improvement in back function and symptoms were higher baseline levels of these measures, receipt of an acupuncture treatment, and non-use of narcotic analgesics. Benefit from acupuncture compared to usual care was greater with worse pretreatment levels of back dysfunction (interaction p < 0.004 for the functional outcome, Roland-Morris Disability Scale at 8 weeks). No other consistent interactions were observed. Conclusion: This secondary analysis found little evidence for the existence of subgroups of patients with chronic back pain that would be especially likely to benefit from acupuncture. However, persons with chronic low back pain who had more severe baseline dysfunction had the most short-term benefit from acupuncture.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test [J].
Brookes, ST ;
Whitely, E ;
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Mulheran, PA ;
Peters, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (03) :229-236
[2]   Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect - A randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care [J].
Burton, AK ;
Waddell, G ;
Tillotson, KM ;
Summerton, N .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (23) :2484-2491
[3]   Efficacy of acupuncture for chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].
Cherkin, Daniel C. ;
Sherman, Karen J. ;
Hogeboom, Charissa J. ;
Erro, Janet H. ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Deyo, Richard A. ;
Avins, Andrew L. .
TRIALS, 2008, 9 (1)
[4]   A Randomized Trial Comparing Acupuncture, Simulated Acupuncture, and Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain [J].
Cherkin, Daniel C. ;
Sherman, Karen J. ;
Avins, Andrew L. ;
Erro, Janet H. ;
Ichikawa, Laura ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Delaney, Kristin ;
Hawkes, Rene ;
Hamilton, Luisa ;
Pressman, Alice ;
Khalsa, Partap S. ;
Deyo, Richard A. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (09) :858-866
[5]   A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study [J].
Childs, JD ;
Fritz, JM ;
Flynn, TW ;
Irrgang, JJ ;
Johnson, KK ;
Majkowski, GR ;
Delitto, A .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (12) :920-928
[6]   Treatments for back pain: Can we get past trivial effects? [J].
Deyo, RA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (12) :957-958
[7]   BACK PAIN AND SCIATICA [J].
FRYMOYER, JW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (05) :291-300
[8]   A supermarket approach to the evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain [J].
Haldeman, Scott ;
Dagenais, Simon .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) :1-7
[9]   Clinical prediction for success of interventions for managing low back pain [J].
Hebert, Jeffrey ;
Koppenhaver, Shane ;
Fritz, Julie ;
Parent, Eric .
CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (03) :463-+
[10]   Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study [J].
Henschke, Nicholas ;
Maher, Christopher G. ;
Refshauge, Kathryn M. ;
Herbert, Robert D. ;
Cumming, Robert G. ;
Bleasel, Jane ;
York, John ;
Das, Anurina ;
McAuley, James H. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7662) :154-157