Infraclavicular plexus block: Multiple injection versus single injection

被引:59
作者
Gaertner, E
Estebe, JP
Zamfir, A
Cuby, C
Macaire, P
机构
[1] CHU Hotel Dieu, Rennes, France
[2] Clin Pk, Lyon, France
[3] CHU Hautepierre, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, F-67098 Strasbourg, France
关键词
anesthetic techniques; regional anesthesia; brachial plexus; infraclavicular approach; nerve stimulation; multiple injection;
D O I
10.1053/rapm.2002.36456
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: This prospective, randomized, and multicentered study was undertaken to evaluate the success rate of coracoid infraclavicular nerve block performed with a nerve stimulator when either 1 or 3 motor responses were sought. Methods: Eighty patients who presented for elbow, forearm, or wrist surgery were randomly allocated to one of the following groups: in group I (single stimulation), 30 ml, local anesthetic (LA) was injected after locating only 1 of the median, ulnar, or radial motor responses. In group 2 (multistimulation), 3 responses were located: musculocutaneous, median or ulnar, and radial response, corresponding, respectively, to the lateral, medial, and posterior cords. A total of 10 mL LA was injected on each response. Bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000 (1:1 vol) were used as the LA mixture. Sensory and motor blocks were tested by a blinded observer. Results: Block duration was slightly increased in the multistimulation group (P = .004). The onset time of sensory and motor block was faster in each nerve distribution, particularly in the radial, musculocutaneous, and antebrachial nerves. The success of anesthesia increased in the multistimulation group. The success rate of the block, without any additional block, sedation, or general anesthesia, increased from 40% in the single stimulation group to 72.5% in the multistimulation group (P < .0001). If the brachial and antebrachial cutaneous nerves were not included in the evaluation, success rate reached 87.5%. Conclusion: We conclude that by performing an infraclavicular block with stimulation of all 3 cords of the brachial plexus, the success rate is higher than when only a single stimulation is used.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 594
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] A comparison of coracoid and axillary approaches to the brachial plexus
    Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ
    Nielsen, PR
    Mortensen, CR
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (03) : 274 - 279
  • [12] Readiness for surgery after axillary block: Single or multiple injection techniques
    KoscielniakNielsen, ZJ
    StensPedersen, HL
    Lippert, FK
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 14 (02) : 164 - 171
  • [13] AXILLARY PLEXUS BLOCK USING A PERIPHERAL-NERVE STIMULATOR - SINGLE OR MULTIPLE INJECTIONS
    LAVOIE, J
    MARTIN, R
    TETRAULT, JP
    COTE, DJ
    COLAS, MJ
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1992, 39 (06): : 583 - 586
  • [14] Neuburger M, 2001, ANAESTHESIST, V50, P511, DOI 10.1007/s001010100170
  • [15] Use of ultrasound to control depth of needle insertion - Reply to Dr. Riopelle
    Ootaki, C
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2001, 26 (04) : 384 - 385
  • [16] RAJ PP, 1973, ANESTH ANALG, V52, P897
  • [17] Axillary brachial plexus block using peripheral nerve stimulator: A comparison between double- and triple-injection techniques
    Sia, S
    Lepri, A
    Ponzecchi, P
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2001, 26 (06) : 499 - 503
  • [18] SIMS JK, 1977, ANESTH ANALG, V56, P554
  • [19] Stadlmeyer W, 2000, ANAESTHESIST, V49, P1030, DOI 10.1007/s001010070018
  • [20] WHIFFLER K, 1981, BRIT J ANAESTH, V53, P845