Flux enhancement during ultrafiltration of produced water using turbulence promoter

被引:23
作者
Zhen Xiang-hua [1 ]
Yu Shui-li [1 ]
Wang Bei-fu [1 ]
Zheng Hai-feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Municipal & Environm Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
关键词
hydraulic dissipated power; flux enhancement; turbulence promoter; produced water; ultrafiltration;
D O I
10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60042-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concentration polarization and membrane fouling remain one of the major hurdles for the implementation of ultrafiltration of produced water. Although many applications for ultrafiltration were already suggested, only few were implemented on an industrial scale. Among those techniques, turbulence promoter can be more simple and effective in overcoming membrane fouling and enhancing membrane flux. As for the result that turbulence promoter increase fluid velocity, wall shear rates and produce secondary flows or instabilities, the influence of turbulence promoter was investigated on permeate flux during produced water ultrafiltration and the potential application of this arrangement for an industrial development. Experimental investigations were performed on 100 KDa molecular weight cut-off PVDF single-channel tubular membrane module using four kinds of turbulence promoters. It is observed that the significant flux enhancement in the range of 83%-164% was achieved while the hydraulic dissipated power per unit volume of permeate decreased from 31%-42%, which indicated that the using of turbulence promoter is more efficient than operation without the turbulence promoter. The effects of transmembrane pressure and cross-flow velocity with and without turbulence promoter were studied as well. Among the four kinds of turbulence promoters, winding inserts with 20.0 mm pitch and 1.0 mm wire diameter showed better performances than the others did.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1081
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   GAS-LIQUID 2-PHASE CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION OF BSA AND DEXTRAN SOLUTIONS [J].
CUI, ZF ;
WRIGHT, KIT .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 90 (1-2) :183-189
[2]  
Gan Q, 1999, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V74, P693, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199907)74:7<693::AID-JCTB93>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-R
[4]  
Gupta B.B., 1995, J MEMBRANE SCI, V99, P31
[5]   Electrically enhanced crossflow membrane filtration of oily waste water using the membrane as a cathode [J].
Huotari, HM ;
Huisman, IH ;
Trägårdh, G .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1999, 156 (01) :49-60
[6]   Ultrasound enhanced cross-flow membrane filtration [J].
Kobayashi, T ;
Chai, X ;
Fujii, N .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :31-40
[7]   Kenics static mixer as turbulence promoter in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk [J].
Krstic, DM ;
Tekic, MN ;
Caric, MD ;
Milanovic, SD .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 38 (07) :1549-1560
[8]   Factors affecting membrane fouling reduction by surface modification and backpulsing [J].
Ma, HM ;
Hakim, LF ;
Bowman, CN ;
Davis, RH .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2001, 189 (02) :255-270
[9]  
MIETTONPEUCHOT M, 1992, J MEMBRANE SCI, V68, P241
[10]   Surface modification of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes and fouling by BSA solutions [J].
Nabe, A ;
Staude, E ;
Belfort, G .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 133 (01) :57-72