Explaining alliance success: Competences, resources, relational factors, and resource-advantage theory

被引:130
作者
Wittmann, C. Michael [1 ]
Hunt, Shelby D. [2 ]
Arnett, Dennis B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Mississippi, Dept Management & Mkt, Coll Business Adm, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Mkt, Rawls Coll Business, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
Alliances; Competences; Resources; Resource-advantage theory; Relational factors; SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; MARKETING-STRATEGY; BUSINESS; COMMITMENT; BUYER; COMMUNICATION; DETERMINANTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.02.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Business alliances, by filling critical resource gaps, enable firms to have positional advantages that lead to superior financial performance. Some alliances, however, are more successful than others. The three prominent theoretical approaches to explaining alliance success rely on resources, competences, and relational factors. The authors theorize that the three approaches are interdependent and, using resource-advantage(R-A) theory as a framework, develop an integrative model. This model proposes that the three approaches are linked by means of relationships among (1) alliance competence, (2) complementary resources, (3) idiosyncratic resources, and (4) cooperation. A test of the model, using a sample of alliance professionals, finds support for the theory that the three approaches are, indeed, interdependent and that resources, construed in the manner of R-A theory, influence alliance success through positional advantage. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 756
页数:14
相关论文
共 106 条
[51]  
Hunt ShelbyD., 2003, J MARKETING THEORY P, V11, P1, DOI [10.1080/10696679.2003.11501928, DOI 10.1080/10696679.2003.11501928]
[52]   Pie-expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships [J].
Jap, SD .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (04) :461-475
[53]   A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research [J].
Jarvis, CB ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Podsakoff, PM .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (02) :199-218
[54]   Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function [J].
Kale, P ;
Dyer, JH ;
Singh, H .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (08) :747-767
[55]  
Kalmbach C.J., 1999, Accenture Outlook Special Edition, P5
[56]   Alliance orientation: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance [J].
Kandemir, Destan ;
Yaprak, Attila ;
Cavusgil, S. Tamer .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (03) :324-340
[57]  
Kiessling T., 2004, Journal of Marketing Channels, V11, P21, DOI DOI 10.1300/J049V11N04_03
[58]   A COMPETENCE-BASED MODEL OF SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE - TOWARD A CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION [J].
LADO, AA ;
BOYD, NG ;
WRIGHT, P .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1992, 18 (01) :77-91
[59]  
Lam M.D., 2004, Pharmaceutical Executive, V24, P56
[60]   Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test [J].
Lambe, CJ ;
Spekman, RE ;
Hunt, SD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2002, 30 (02) :141-158