Performance of preconditioned iterative and multigrid solvers in solving the three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling problem using the staggered finite-difference method: a comparative study

被引:12
作者
Li, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lili [2 ]
Hao, Tianyao [2 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Minist Educ, Key Lab Submarine Geosci & Prospecting Technol, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Petr Resources Res, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
magnetotellurics; staggered finite-difference method; three-dimensional modeling; preconditioned iterative solvers; multigrid solver; divergence correction; 3-D ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS; FREQUENCY-DOMAIN; INVERSION; EQUATIONS; ACCURACY; CSEM;
D O I
10.1088/1742-2132/13/1/1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
An effective solver for the large complex system of linear equations is critical for improving the accuracy of numerical solutions in three-dimensional (3D) magnetotelluric (MT) modeling using the staggered finite-difference (SFD) method. In electromagnetic modeling, the formed system of linear equations is commonly solved using preconditioned iterative relaxation methods. We present 3D MT modeling using the SFD method, based on former work. The multigrid solver and three solvers preconditioned by incomplete Cholesky decomposition the minimum residual method, the generalized product bi-conjugate gradient method and the bi-conjugate gradient stabilized method-are used to solve the formed system of linear equations. Divergence correction for the magnetic field is applied. We also present a comparison of the stability and convergence of these iterative solvers if divergence correction is used. Model tests show that divergence correction improves the convergence of iterative solvers and the accuracy of numerical results. Divergence correction can also decrease the number of iterations for fast convergence without changing the stability of linear solvers. For consideration of the computation time and memory requirements, the multigrid solver combined with divergence correction is preferred for 3D MT field simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling [J].
Amestoy, PR ;
Duff, IS ;
L'Excellent, JY ;
Koster, J .
SIAM JOURNAL ON MATRIX ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, 23 (01) :15-41
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, TEMPLATES SOLUTION L, DOI DOI 10.1137/1.9781611971538
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ITERATIVE METHODS SP, DOI DOI 10.1137/1.9780898718003
[4]   Three-dimensional electromagnetic modelling and inversion from theory to application [J].
Avdeev, DB .
SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2005, 26 (06) :767-799
[5]   A new technique for the incorporation of seafloor topography in electromagnetic modelling [J].
Baba, K ;
Seama, N .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 150 (02) :392-402
[6]   Study on divergence correction method in three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling with staggered-grid finite difference method [J].
Chen Hui ;
Deng Ju-Zhi ;
Tan Han-Dong ;
Yang Hai-Yan .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2011, 54 (06) :1649-1659
[7]  
d'Erceville I., 1962, GEOPHYSICS, V27, P651, DOI DOI 10.1190/1.1439075
[8]   GPBiCG(m, l):: A hybrid of BiCGSTAB and GPBiCG methods with efficiency and robustness [J].
Fujino, S .
APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2002, 41 (01) :107-117
[9]   Three-dimensional parallel distributed inversion of CSEM data using a direct forward solver [J].
Grayver, A. V. ;
Streich, R. ;
Ritter, O. .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 193 (03) :1432-1446
[10]   A comparison of accuracy and computation time of three-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling algorithms [J].
Han, Nuree ;
Nam, Myung Jin ;
Kim, Hee Joon ;
Song, Yoonho ;
Suh, Jung Hee .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 6 (02) :136-145