Assessment of bachelor's theses in a nursing degree with a rubrics system: Development and validation study

被引:14
作者
Gonzalez-Chorda, Victor M. [1 ]
Mena-Tudela, Desiree [1 ]
Salas-Medina, Pablo [1 ]
Cervera-Gasch, Agueda [1 ]
Orts-Cortes, Isabel [2 ]
Macia-Soler, Loreto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Dept Nursing, Avda Sos Baynat S-N, Castellon de La Plana 12071, Spain
[2] Univ Alicante, Dept Nursing, Carretera San Vicente Raspeig S-N, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
关键词
Nursing student; Nursing education; Bachelor's thesis; Rubrics; Evaluation; EXPERIENCES; EDUCATION; VALIDITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.033
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Writing a bachelor thesis (BT) is the last step to obtain a nursing degree. In order to perform an effective assessment of a nursing BT, certain reliable and valid tools are required. Objectives: To develop and validate a 3-rubric system (drafting process, dissertation, and viva) to assess final year nursing students' BT. Design: A multi-disciplinary study of content validity and psychometric properties. The study was carried out between December 2014 and July 2015. Settings: Nursing Degree at Universitat Jaume I. Spain. Participants: Eleven experts (9 nursing professors and 2 education professors from 6 different universities) took part in the development and content validity stages. Fifty-two theses presented during the 2014-2015 academic year were included by consecutive sampling of cases in order to study the psychometric properties. Methods: First, a group of experts was created to validate the content of the assessment system based on three rubrics (drafting process, dissertation, and viva). Subsequently, a reliability and validity study of the rubrics was carried out on the 52 theses presented during the 2014-2015 academic year. Results: The BT drafting process rubric has 8 criteria (S-CVI = 0.93; alpha= 0.837; ICC = 0.614); the dissertation rubric has 7 criteria (S-CVI = 0.9; alpha= 0.893; ICC = 0.74), and the viva rubric has 4 criteria (S-CVI = 0.86; alpha= 8.16; ICC = 0.895). Conclusion: A nursing BT assessment system based on three rubrics (drafting process, dissertation, and viva) has been validated. This system may be transferred to other nursing degrees or degrees from other academic areas. It is necessary to continue with the validation process taking into account factors that may affect the results obtained. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 107
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Assessing the Reliability, Validity, and Use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: Three Approaches [J].
Adamson, Katie Anne ;
Gubrud, Paula ;
Sideras, Stephanie ;
Lasater, Kathie .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2012, 51 (02) :66-73
[2]   Impact of the Bachelor's thesis on the nursing profession [J].
不详 .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2015, 35 (01) :16-17
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, B OFICIAL ESTADO, P83
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, B OFICIAL ESTADO, P48
[5]   Supervising undergraduate research: A collective approach utilising groupwork and peer support [J].
Baker, Mary-Jane ;
Cluett, Elizabeth ;
Ireland, Lorraine ;
Reading, Sheila ;
Rourke, Susan .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2014, 34 (04) :637-642
[6]  
Fitch KBSJ., 2001, The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. RAND
[7]  
Kapborg I, 2002, Int Nurs Rev, V49, P122, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-7657.2002.00123.x
[8]  
Krippendorff K., 2007, Testing the reliability of content analysis data: What is involved and why
[9]  
Lasater K, 2007, J NURS EDUC, V46, P496, DOI 10.3928/01484834-20071101-04
[10]   Quality assessment and comparison of grading between examiners and supervisors of Bachelor theses in nursing education [J].
Lundgren, Solveig M. ;
Halvarsson, Maud ;
Robertsson, Barbro .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2008, 28 (01) :24-32