Nonverbal Sensitivity in Medical Students: Implications for Clinical Interactions

被引:57
作者
Hall, Judith A. [1 ]
Roter, Debra L. [2 ]
Blanch, Danielle C. [1 ]
Frankel, Richard M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Psychol NI 125, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
nonverbal sensitivity; emotion recognition; patient-centered behavior; medical students; standardized patients; PATIENT SATISFACTION; EMOTION RECOGNITION; PHYSICIAN GENDER; COMMUNICATION; ACCURACY; BEHAVIOR; SKILLS; EXPRESSION; DISORDERS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-009-1107-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinicians' accuracy in perceiving nonverbal cues has potentially important consequences, but has received insufficient research. To examine the relation of medical students' nonverbal sensitivity to their gender and personal traits, as well as to their communication and impressions made during a standardized patient (SP) visit. Psychometric testing, questionnaire, and observation. One US medical school. Two-hundred seventy-five third-year medical students. Nonverbal sensitivity and attitudes were measured using standard instruments. Communication during the SP visit was measured using trained coders and analogue patients who viewed the videotapes and rated the favorability of their impressions of the student. Nonverbal sensitivity was higher in female than male students (P < 0.001) and was positively correlated with self-reported patient-centered attitudes (P < 0.01) and ability to name one's own emotions (P < 0.05). It was also associated with less distressed (P < 0.05), more dominant (P < 0.001), and more engaged (P < 0.01) behavior by the SP, and with more liking of the medical student (P < 0.05) and higher ratings of compassion (P < 0.05) by the analogue patients. Correlations between nonverbal sensitivity and other variables were generally stronger and different for male than female students, but nonverbal sensitivity predicted analogue patients' impressions similarly for male and female students. Medical students' nonverbal sensitivity was related to clinically relevant attitudes and behavioral style in a clinical simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1222
页数:6
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Surgeons' tone of voice: A clue to malpractice history [J].
Ambady, N ;
LaPlante, D ;
Nguyen, T ;
Rosenthal, R ;
Chaumeton, N ;
Levinson, W .
SURGERY, 2002, 132 (01) :5-9
[2]   Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream [J].
Ambady, N ;
Bernieri, FJ ;
Richeson, JA .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 32, 2000, 32 :201-271
[3]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PRACTICE STYLE - A DUTCH STUDY OF GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS [J].
BENSING, JM ;
VANDENBRINKMUINEN, A ;
DEBAKKER, DH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (03) :219-229
[4]   SOMATIC PRESENTATION OF DSM-III PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS IN PRIMARY CARE [J].
BRIDGES, KW ;
GOLDBERG, DP .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1985, 29 (06) :563-569
[5]   Male and female managers' ability to 'read' emotions: Relationships with supervisor's performance ratings and subordinates' satisfaction ratings [J].
Byron, Kristin .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 80 :713-733
[6]   Nonverbal emotion recognition and salespersons: Linking ability to perceived and actual success [J].
Byron, Kristin ;
Terranova, Sophia ;
Nowicki, Stephen, Jr. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 37 (11) :2600-2619
[7]   TRAINING STUDENTS TO DECODE VERBAL AND NONVERBAL CUES - EFFECTS ON CONFIDENCE AND PERFORMANCE [J].
COSTANZO, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :308-313
[8]  
*DHHS, 1980, NAT AMB MED CAR SURV, V13
[9]   PREDICTING PATIENT SATISFACTION FROM PHYSICIANS NONVERBAL-COMMUNICATION SKILLS [J].
DIMATTEO, MR ;
TARANTA, A ;
FRIEDMAN, HS ;
PRINCE, LM .
MEDICAL CARE, 1980, 18 (04) :376-387
[10]   RELATIONSHIP OF PHYSICIANS NONVERBAL-COMMUNICATION SKILL TO PATIENT SATISFACTION, APPOINTMENT NONCOMPLIANCE, AND PHYSICIAN WORKLOAD [J].
DIMATTEO, MR ;
HAYS, RD ;
PRINCE, LM .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 5 (06) :581-594