Application of the Kessner and Kotelchuck Prenatal Care Adequacy Indices in a Preterm Birth Population

被引:30
作者
Bloch, Joan Rosen [1 ]
Dawley, Katy [2 ]
Suplee, Patricia Dunphy [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Coll Nursing & Hlth Profess, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[2] Philadelphia Univ, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Kessner Index; Kotelchuck Index; methodological challenges measuring PNC; prenatal care adequacy indices; prenatal care utilization; preterm birth; INFANT-MORTALITY RATES; MATERNAL HEALTH; NURSE-MIDWIVES; MIDWIFERY CARE; UNITED-STATES; OUTCOMES; RISK; AMERICAN; WEIGHT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00803.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives Healthy People 2010 goals to eliminate racial and ethnic health disparities that persist in the utilization of prenatal care (PNC) highlight the importance of measuring PNC as a variable in maternal and infant health outcomes research. These disparities are significantly correlated to adverse infant outcomes in preterm birth (PTB), a leading cause of infant mortality and life-long morbidity. Currently the most extensively used PNC adequacy indices (Kessner and Kotelchuck) were developed to measure outcomes in populations consisting mostly of full-term births. It is unclear whether these PNC adequacy indices are reliable when pregnancy is truncated due to PTB (< 37 weeks). This paper compares and demonstrates how they can be applied in a specific PTB cohort. Design and Sample This secondary analysis of a nested case-control study compares Kessner and Kotelchuck adequacy scores of 367 mothers of PTB infants. Results There were significant differences in the rating of PNC inadequacy ( p <.001) depending on the PNC adequacy index used. Conclusion Critical evaluation is warranted before using these PNC adequacy indices in future public health nursing and PTB research.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 459
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Alexander GR, 1996, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V111, P408
[2]  
ALEXANDER GR, 1987, AM J PREV MED, V3, P243
[3]  
Alexander GR, 2001, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V116, P306
[4]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1989, STAND OBST GYN SERV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010, V2nd
[6]   Selection bias in prenatal care use by Medicaid recipients. [J].
Janice F. Bell ;
Frederick J. Zimmerman .
Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2003, 7 (4) :239-252
[7]  
BLOCH JR, 2001, THESIS U PENNSYLVANI
[8]   Reducing infant mortality rates using the perinatal periods of risk model [J].
Burns, PG .
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2005, 22 (01) :2-7
[9]   The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States [J].
Callaghan, William M. ;
MacDorman, Marian F. ;
Rasmussen, Sonja A. ;
Qin, Cheng ;
Lackritz, Eve M. .
PEDIATRICS, 2006, 118 (04) :1566-1573
[10]   OBSTETRIC AND PERINATAL EVENTS - THE ACCURACY OF MATERNAL REPORT [J].
CASEY, R ;
RIECKHOFF, M ;
BEEBE, SA ;
PINTOMARTIN, J .
CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1992, 31 (04) :200-204