Top-down purification of Tobacyk's Revised Paranormal Belief Scale

被引:114
作者
Lange, R
Irwin, HJ
Houran, J
机构
[1] Illinois State Board Educ, Div Assessment E216, Springfield, IL 62777 USA
[2] Univ New England, Dept Psychol, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[3] So Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Springfield, IL 62705 USA
关键词
Tobacyk's Revised Paranormal Belief Scale; Rasch scaling; top-down purification; gender bias; differential item functioning;
D O I
10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00183-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Using mostly undergraduate student data (N = 560), factor analysis confirmed the existence of seven factors in Tobacyk's Revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS). However. this replication proved to be of dubious value since (1) the factor structure was significantly affected by age and gender; (2) the items in Tobacyk's original factors were significantly non-additive; (3) the items showed pervasive differential item functioning (DIF) related to respondents' ages, gender, or both; and (4) simulations indicated that the factor structure are the result of DIF. The removal of DIF via "top-down purification" yielded two correlated clusters of items dubbed "New Age Philosophy" and "Traditional Paranormal Beliefs". Both clusters obey an Andrich rating-scale model with person reliabilities of 0.90 and 0.74, respectively. Principal component analysis confirmed that these two clusters are unidimensional and without significant age or gender DIF (p > 0.10), While the Traditional Paranormal Beliefs cluster continued to show a significant main effect of age, neither cluster showed a significant gender effect, thereby calling into question some traditional findings regarding paranormal beliefs. We strongly suspect that the dearth of DIF studies indicates that age and gender biases due to DIF have largely gone unnoticed in the extant personality and assessment literature. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 156
页数:26
相关论文
共 73 条
[2]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[3]  
Andrich D., 1988, RASCH MODELS MEASURE, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412985598
[4]  
[Anonymous], INTRO PARAPSYCHOLOGY
[5]  
Arbuckle J. L., 1997, AMOS USERS GUIDE VER
[6]   EFFECT OF DISSIMULATION MOTIVATION AND ANXIETY ON RESPONSE PATTERN APPROPRIATENESS MEASURES [J].
BIRENBAUM, M .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1986, 10 (02) :167-174
[7]   RASCH MODEL, LAW OF COMPARATIVE JUDGMENT AND ADDITIVE CONJOINT MEASUREMENT [J].
BROGDEN, HE .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1977, 42 (04) :631-634
[8]  
Camilli G., 1994, METHODS IDENTIFYING
[9]   A LATENT TRAIT ANALYSIS OF THE MMPI [J].
CARTER, JE ;
WILKINSON, L .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1984, 19 (04) :385-407
[10]  
Clauser B.E., 1998, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V17, P31, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1998.TB00619.X