Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search

被引:3
作者
Yamauchi, Kenji [1 ]
Osugi, Takayuki [1 ,2 ]
Murakami, Ikuya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Psychol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Japan Soc Promot Sci, Tokyo, Japan
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2017年 / 8卷
关键词
visual marking; singleton; attentional capture; visual search; preview benefit; TIME-BASED SELECTION; PREVIEW SEARCH; TOP-DOWN; PRIORITIZING SELECTION; PERCEPTUAL SELECTIVITY; ACTIVE SUPPRESSION; OLD OBJECTS; INHIBITION; COLOR; SALIENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00801
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Visual search is easier after observing some distractors in advance; it is as if the previewed distractors were excluded from the search. This effect is referred to as the preview benefit, and a memory template that visually marks the old locations of the distractors is thought to help in prioritizing the locations of newly presented items. One remaining question is whether the presence of a conspicuous item during the sequential shift of attention within the new items reduces this preview benefit. To address this issue, we combined the above preview search and a conventional visual search paradigm using a singleton distractor and examined whether the search performance was affected by the presence of the singleton. The results showed that the slope of reaction time as a function of set size became steeper in the presence of a singleton, indicating that the singleton distractor reduced the preview benefit. Furthermore, this degradation effect was positively correlated with the degree of conventional attentional capture to a singleton measured in a separate experiment with simultaneous search. These findings suggest that the mechanism of visual marking shares common attentional resources with the search process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Previewing distracters reduces their effective contrast [J].
Allen, H. A. ;
Humphreys, G. W. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2007, 47 (23) :2992-3000
[2]   Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Folk, Charles L. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (02) :342-352
[3]   Visual marking: A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search [J].
Atchley, P ;
Jones, SE ;
Hoffman, L .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (05) :667-677
[4]   OVERRIDING STIMULUS-DRIVEN ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE [J].
BACON, WF ;
EGETH, HE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 55 (05) :485-496
[5]   Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference [J].
Barras, Caroline ;
Kerzel, Dirk .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 121 :74-83
[6]   What is top-down about contingent capture? [J].
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Schreij, Daniel ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (02) :326-341
[7]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[8]  
Braithwaite JJ, 2005, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V67, P81
[9]   Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search [J].
Braithwaite, JJ ;
Humphreys, GW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (02) :213-237
[10]   Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control [J].
Donk, M ;
Theeuwes, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (08) :1231-1242