Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure?

被引:124
作者
Guan, JianCheng [1 ]
Zuo, KaiRui [1 ]
Chen, KaiHua [2 ]
Yam, Richard C. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Collaboration network; Structural holes; Degree centrality; Closeness centrality; Abetweenness centrality; Country-level R&D efficiency; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; CROSS-COUNTRY; SMALL WORLD; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; PRODUCTIVITY; EMBEDDEDNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this study, we attempt to fill an important gap that literature has yet to investigate, that is, the influence of collaboration network structure on national research and development (R&D) efficiency. We not only provide country-level evidence that the collaboration network structure influences the R&D result performance measured by output quantity. We also prove that the collaboration network structure influences the R&D process performance measured by input-output efficiency score. The latter exploration presents the underlying explanations for the former conclusion. We construct a unique dataset that enables us to build seven scientific collaboration networks at the country level. Based on the collections of R&D data for each country in our networks, we have measured R&D efficiency scores by using the Malmquist productivity index associated with data envelopment analysis. The clustering coefficient (CC), structural holes (SH), degree centrality (DC), closeness centrality (CNC), and betweenness centrality (BC) of each country are jointly used to comprehensively measure the structural properties of collaboration networks. Panel data models are employed to explore the effect of the network properties on R&D efficiency. Our results not only reconfirm that collaboration network structure influences scientific publications at the country level, but also show that the higher SH, DC, CNC, and BC correlate positively with the better future efficiency. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 784
页数:15
相关论文
共 106 条
[32]   Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions [J].
De Prato, Giuditta ;
Nepelski, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2014, 39 (03) :358-375
[33]   The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns [J].
Ding, Waverly W. ;
Levin, Sharon G. ;
Stephan, Paula E. ;
Winkler, Anne E. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 56 (09) :1439-1461
[34]   Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models [J].
Drukker, David M. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2003, 3 (02) :168-177
[35]   Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network [J].
Erdi, Peter ;
Makovi, Kinga ;
Somogyvari, Zoltan ;
Strandburg, Katherine ;
Tobochnik, Jan ;
Volf, Peter ;
Zalanyi, Laszlo .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (01) :225-242
[36]   Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: the case of biotechnology in Canada [J].
Eslami, Hamidreza ;
Ebadi, Ashkan ;
Schiffauerova, Andrea .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 97 (01) :99-119
[37]   Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in African agriculture [J].
Nkamleu, GB .
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2004, 16 (01) :203-222
[38]   The relational antecedents of project-entrepreneurship: Network centrality, team composition and project performance [J].
Ferriani, Simone ;
Cattani, Gino ;
Baden-Fuller, Charles .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (10) :1545-1558
[39]   Recombinant uncertainty in technological search [J].
Fleming, L .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (01) :117-132
[40]   Small worlds and regional innovation [J].
Fleming, Lee ;
King, Charles, III ;
Juda, Adam I. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (06) :938-954