Does country-level R&D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure?

被引:124
作者
Guan, JianCheng [1 ]
Zuo, KaiRui [1 ]
Chen, KaiHua [2 ]
Yam, Richard C. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Collaboration network; Structural holes; Degree centrality; Closeness centrality; Abetweenness centrality; Country-level R&D efficiency; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; CROSS-COUNTRY; SMALL WORLD; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; PRODUCTIVITY; EMBEDDEDNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this study, we attempt to fill an important gap that literature has yet to investigate, that is, the influence of collaboration network structure on national research and development (R&D) efficiency. We not only provide country-level evidence that the collaboration network structure influences the R&D result performance measured by output quantity. We also prove that the collaboration network structure influences the R&D process performance measured by input-output efficiency score. The latter exploration presents the underlying explanations for the former conclusion. We construct a unique dataset that enables us to build seven scientific collaboration networks at the country level. Based on the collections of R&D data for each country in our networks, we have measured R&D efficiency scores by using the Malmquist productivity index associated with data envelopment analysis. The clustering coefficient (CC), structural holes (SH), degree centrality (DC), closeness centrality (CNC), and betweenness centrality (BC) of each country are jointly used to comprehensively measure the structural properties of collaboration networks. Panel data models are employed to explore the effect of the network properties on R&D efficiency. Our results not only reconfirm that collaboration network structure influences scientific publications at the country level, but also show that the higher SH, DC, CNC, and BC correlate positively with the better future efficiency. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 784
页数:15
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Chung, Kon Shing Kenneth ;
Hossain, Liaquat .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 48 (04) :671-679
[2]   Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Altmann, Joern ;
Hossain, Liaquat .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (04) :594-607
[3]   Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation [J].
Abrahamson, E ;
Rosenkopf, L .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (03) :289-309
[4]   Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct [J].
Afuah, Allan .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (03) :257-273
[5]   Introduction to the Special Issue: The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks [J].
Ahuja, Gautam ;
Soda, Giuseppe ;
Zaheer, Akbar .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (02) :434-448
[6]   COLLECTIVE INVENTION [J].
ALLEN, RC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1983, 4 (01) :1-24
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Structural Holes
[8]   Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan [J].
Badar, Kamal ;
Hite, Julie M. ;
Badir, Yuosre F. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 94 (02) :755-775
[9]   SOCIOMETRIC LOCATION AND INNOVATIVENESS - REFORMULATION AND EXTENSION OF DIFFUSION MODEL [J].
BECKER, MH .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1970, 35 (02) :267-282
[10]   The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography [J].
Bercovitz, Janet ;
Feldman, Maryann .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (01) :81-93