Establishment of Land Use Suitability Mapping Criteria Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with Practitioners and Beneficiaries

被引:49
作者
Morales, Florentino, Jr. [1 ]
de Vries, Walter Timo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich TUM, Dept Aerosp & Geodesy, Chair Land Management, Arcisstr 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany
关键词
land use suitability analysis; evaluation criteria; criteria weights; land use; AHP; MCE; preference subjectivity; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; GIS; PREFERENCES; CONSERVATION; COMBINATION; SELECTION; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/land10030235
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The presence of land use conflicts is often unavoidable as land is finite and a scarce resource. With development as a prime goal, the increasing demands for specific uses make the situation more serious than it was before. In the context of land uses, suitability determines the inherent capacity of the land to perform a defined use with optimum efficiency and sustainability. However, single land use suitability analysis could not answer the overall objective of land allocation. Thus, this study considers the primary and general land uses with the valuable evaluation criteria necessary for simultaneous land use suitability analyses. This paper aims at establishing the relevant and necessary evaluation criteria for Multicriteria Evaluation (MCE) using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for land use suitability analysis for residential, industrial, commercial, agricultural, and forest land uses. The factors which could be used as indicators in land suitability analysis were derived from both literature review and through experts' knowledge. Correspondingly, the relative importance (weights) of the criteria established were derived using pairwise comparisons through the AHP technique readily available for subsequent GIS analysis. Last, the criteria developed are general in nature and could be replicated and/or altered depending upon the local needs and situations.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]   Decision making under subjective uncertainty [J].
Campos, Fabio ;
Neves, Andre ;
Campello de Souza, Fernando M. .
2007 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING, 2007, :85-+
[12]   Using partial participatory GIS in vulnerability and disaster risk reduction in Grenada [J].
Canevari-Luzardo, Laura ;
Bastide, Joan ;
Choutet, Isabelle ;
Liverman, Diana .
CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 9 (02) :95-109
[13]   Uncertainty averse preferences [J].
Cerreia-Vioglio, S. ;
Maccheroni, F. ;
Marinacci, M. ;
Montrucchio, L. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2011, 146 (04) :1275-1330
[14]   Revealed preferences under uncertainty: Incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization [J].
Cettolin, Elena ;
Riedl, Arno .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2019, 181 :547-585
[15]   GIS-based analytic hierarchy process as a multicriteria decision analysis instrument: a review [J].
Chandio, Imtiaz Ahmed ;
Matori, Abd Nasir B. ;
WanYusof, Khamaruzaman B. ;
Talpur, Mir Aftab Hussain ;
Balogun, Abdul-Lateef ;
Lawal, Dano Umar .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 6 (08) :3059-3066
[16]   Large-scale group decision-making with non-cooperative behaviors and heterogeneous preferences: An application in financial inclusion [J].
Chao, Xiangrui ;
Kou, Gang ;
Peng, Yi ;
Viedma, Enrique Herrera .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 288 (01) :271-293
[17]   The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: A survey [J].
Chen, Xia ;
Zhang, Hengjie ;
Dong, Yucheng .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2015, 24 :72-83
[18]   A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Choo, EU ;
Wedley, WC .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (06) :893-908
[19]  
Dalavi P., 2014, GEOMETRIX, P92
[20]  
De Vries W., 2017, Flachenmanag. Und Bodenordn, V79, P65