Microwave-assisted and analytical pyrolysis of coking and non-coking coals: Comparison of tar and char compositions

被引:45
作者
Reddy, B. Rajasekhar [1 ]
Shravani, B. [1 ]
Das, Bidyut [2 ,3 ]
Dash, Pratik Swarup [2 ,3 ]
Vinu, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Chem Engn, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Natl Ctr Combust Res & Dev, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Tata Steel Ltd, Coal & Coke Making Res Grp, Jamshedpur 831001, Bihar, India
关键词
Pyrolysis; Coking coal; High ash Indian coal; Coal tar; Microwave; FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS; BIOMASS; LIQUEFACTION; LIGNITE; OIL; GASIFICATION; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaap.2019.05.003
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Pyrolysis conditions and mechanism greatly influence the quality of tar and char from coal, which eventually determine their further usage. This work investigates the pyrolysis of three coking coals and a non-coking high ash Indian coal via microwave-assisted and conventional heating, and the influence of heating rate, coal type, and heating mechanism on product yields and tar composition. Microwave pyrolysis experiments were conducted in a home-built microwave reactor, and analytical pyrolysis experiments were conducted in a Pyroprobe (R) interfaced with gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (Py-GC/MS). The tar yields from microwave pyrolysis of coking coals were similar (similar to 7 wt.%), while it was slightly high from high ash Indian coal (similar to 11 wt.%). Char yields from both microwave and analytical pyrolysis were similar (78 +/- 1.5 wt.%). Microwave pyrolysis tars were rich in naphthalene derivatives and polyaromatics with more than 45% selectivity, while analytical pyrolysis tar was rich in monoaromatics (> 30%). There was no significant variation in the selectivities of other organic fractions. High selectivity of polyaromatics in microwave pyrolysis tar is due to the generation of localized hotspots, which led to excessive cracking of primary pyrolysis vapors. The higher heating value (HHV) of microwave pyrolysis tar was 32-33 MJ kg(-1), while that of analytical pyrolysis tar was higher (35-36 MJ kg(-1)), which is attributed to the presence of more monoaromatics in the latter. Hydrogen and methane were the major components in the gaseous fraction. Coal chars were characterized using different techniques, and they were rich in carbon (approximate to 80 wt.%) with high energy content (29 MJ kg(-1)).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of Mississippi coal: A comparative study with conventional pyrolysis [J].
Abdelsayed, Victor ;
Shekhawat, Dushyant ;
Smith, Mark W. ;
Link, Dirk ;
Stiegman, Albert E. .
FUEL, 2018, 217 :656-667
[2]   A review on the susceptor assisted microwave processing of materials [J].
Bhattacharya, Madhuchhanda ;
Basak, Tanmay .
ENERGY, 2016, 97 :306-338
[3]   Does microwave heating have a role in functional group reactions of coal? [J].
Bodman, S ;
MonsefMirzai, P ;
Manak, H ;
McWhinnie, WR .
FUEL, 1997, 76 (13) :1315-1318
[4]  
Cha C.Y., 1993, FUEL SCI TECHN INT, V11, P1175, DOI [DOI 10.1080/08843759308916124, 10.1080/08843759308916124]
[5]   RETRACTED: Coal and Biomass Partial Gasification and Soot Properties in an Atmospheric Fluidized Bed (Retracted article. See vol. 31, pg. 1051, 2017) [J].
Chen, Guoyan ;
Zhang, Yanguo ;
Zhu, Jiulong ;
Cao, Yan ;
Pan, Weiping .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2011, 25 (05) :1964-1969
[6]  
Choudhury N, 2008, CURR SCI INDIA, V94, P74
[7]   THE C-H BOND-ENERGY OF BENZENE [J].
DAVICO, GE ;
BIERBAUM, VM ;
DEPUY, CH ;
ELLISON, GB ;
SQUIRES, RR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 117 (09) :2590-2599
[8]  
Debalina B., 2017, J ANAL APPL PYROL, V124, P1
[9]   MICROWAVE AND CONVENTIONAL PYROLYSIS OF A BITUMINOUS COAL [J].
GASNER, LL ;
DENLOYE, AO ;
REGAN, TM .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS, 1986, 48 (4-6) :349-354
[10]   Chemicals from Coal Coking [J].
Granda, Marcos ;
Blanco, Clara ;
Alvarez, Patricia ;
Patrick, John W. ;
Menendez, Rosa .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2014, 114 (03) :1608-1636