Radiation Dose Escalation for Localized Prostate Cancer Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Permanent Transperineal Brachytherapy

被引:37
作者
Wong, William W. [1 ]
Vora, Sujay A. [1 ]
Schild, Steven E. [1 ]
Ezzell, Gary A. [1 ]
Andrews, Paul E. [2 ]
Ferrigni, Robert G. [2 ]
Swanson, Scott K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Radiat Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Urol, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; radiation dose escalation; 3-dimensional conformal therapy; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; brachytherapy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SEED IMPLANTATION; THERAPY; TRIAL; IRRADIATION; FAILURE; TUMORS; GY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.24558
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In the current study, the effects of dose escalation for localized prostate cancer treatment with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or permanent transperineal brachytherapy (BRT) in comparison with conventional dose 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) were evaluated. METHODS: This study included 853 patients; 270 received conventional dose 3D-CRT, 314 received high-dose IMRT, 225 received BRT, and 44 received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + BIRT boost. The median radiation doses were 68.4 grays (Gy) for 3D-CRT and 75.6 Gy for IMRT. BRT patients received a prescribed dose of 144 Gy with iodine-125 (1-125) or 120 Gy with palladium-103 (Pd-103), respectively. Patients treated with EBRT + BRT received 45 Gy of EBRT plus a boost of 110 Gy with 1-125 or 90 Gy with Pd-103. Risk group categories were low risk (T1-T2 disease, prostate-specific antigen level <= 10 ng/mL, and a Gleason score <= 6), intermediate risk (increase in value of 1 of the factors), and high risk (increase in value of >= 2 factors). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 58 months, the 5-year biochemical control (bNED) rates were 74% for 3D-CRT, 87% for IMRT, 94% for BRT, and 94% for EBRT + BRT (P <.0001). For the intermediate-risk group, high-dose IMRT, BRT, or EBRT + BRT achieved significantly better bNED rates than 3D-CRT (P <.0001), whereas no improvement was noted for the low-risk group (P =.22). There was no increase in gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity from high-dose IMRT compared with conventional dose 3D-CRT, although there was more grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity (toxicities were graded at the time of each follow-up visit using a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] scale). BRT caused more GU but less GI toxicity, whereas EBRT + BRT caused more late GU and GI toxicity than IMRT or 3D-CRT. CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study indicate that radiation dose escalation improved the bNED rate for the intermediate-risk group. IMRT caused less acute and late GU toxicity than BRT or EBRT + BRT. Cancer 2009; 115:5596-606. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:5596 / 5606
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A prospective analysis of tong-term quality of life after permanent I-125 brachytherapy for locatised prostate cancer [J].
Ash, Dan ;
Bottomley, David ;
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar ;
Carey, Brendan ;
Gould, Kath ;
Henry, Ann .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 (02) :135-139
[2]   Failure-free survival following brachytherapy alone or external beam irradiation alone for T1-2 prostate tumors in 2222 patients: Results from a single practice [J].
Brachman, DG ;
Thomas, T ;
Hilbe, J ;
Beyer, DC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (01) :111-117
[3]   Patient and treatment factors associated with complications after prostate brachytherapy [J].
Chen, Aileen B. ;
D'Amico, Anthony V. ;
Neville, Bridget A. ;
Earle, Craig C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (33) :5298-5304
[4]   Long-term urinary sequelae following 125iodine prostate brachytherapy [J].
Crook, Juanita ;
Fleshner, Neil ;
Roberts, Chris ;
Pond, Greg .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (01) :141-145
[5]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[7]   Is α/β for prostate tumors really low? [J].
Fowler, J ;
Chappell, R ;
Ritter, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (04) :1021-1031
[8]  
HARRIDEN P, 2007, CANCER, V109, P13
[9]  
Jani Ashesh B, 2004, Med Dosim, V29, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.meddos.2003.09.005
[10]   Cancer statistics, 2008 [J].
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Siegel, Rebecca ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Hao, Yongping ;
Xu, Jiaquan ;
Murray, Taylor ;
Thun, Michael J. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2008, 58 (02) :71-96