Evaluating Sustainable Development by Composite Index: Evidence from French Departments

被引:32
作者
Bonnet, Jean [1 ]
Coll-Martinez, Eva [2 ]
Renou-Maissant, Patricia [3 ]
机构
[1] Normandy Univ, SEGGAT CREM, F-14032 Caen, France
[2] Sci Po Toulouse, LEREPS, F-31042 Toulouse, France
[3] Paris Nanterre Univ, EconomiX, F-92001 Nanterre, France
关键词
sustainable development; composite index; cluster analysis; spatial autocorrelation analysis; France; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TRANSITIONS; INDICATORS; PATHWAYS; POLICY; MIXES;
D O I
10.3390/su13020761
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals by the United Nations, sustainability has been a key priority for European governments. While previous studies have investigated the associations between indicators of sustainable development, few have directly considered a multidimensional approach to assess and compare the performance of regions in terms of sustainable development. As such, a comprehensive assessment of regional sustainable performance is thus still needed. In this paper, the concept of sustainability relies on the construction of six composite indices (environment and natural resources, energy transition, sustainable mobility, economic dynamism, social cohesion and solidarity, and governance and citizenship) with the aim to provide an evaluation framework for empirically comparing the performance of the 96 metropolitan French Departments. Each dimension is explored by spatial autocorrelation analysis and Hierarchical Ascending Classification (HAC) to classify French Departments providing five different regional profiles of sustainable development. The findings make it possible to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the departments in the implementation of sustainable development. This approach provides the bases for a systematic monitoring of sustainable development policies at the regional scale.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 80 条
[11]   The Emergence of Circular Economy A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity [J].
Blomsma, Fenna ;
Brennan, Geraldine .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 (03) :603-614
[12]  
Bonnet J., 2018, TRAJECTORIES ENERGY
[13]   Genuine Savings as an Indicator for "Weak" Sustainability: Critical Survey and Possible Ways forward in Practical Measuring [J].
Boos, Adrian .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (04) :4146-4182
[14]  
Bovar O., 2008, EC FR COMPTES DO, V1, P51
[15]   Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? [J].
Boyd, James .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 61 (04) :716-723
[16]   Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type [J].
Bramley, Glen ;
Power, Sinead .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2009, 36 (01) :30-48
[17]   The Human Sustainable Development Index: New calculations and a first critical analysis [J].
Bravo, Giangiacomo .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 37 :145-150
[18]   Towards sustainable city policy: an economy-environment technology nexus [J].
Camagni, R ;
Capello, R ;
Nijkamp, P .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 24 (01) :103-118
[19]   Evaluating Renewable Energy Sustainability by Composite Index [J].
Cirstea, Stefan Dragos ;
Moldovan-Teselios, Calin ;
Cirstea, Andreea ;
Turcu, Antoniu Claudiu ;
Darab, Cosmin Pompei .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03)
[20]  
Coutard O., 2002, Espaces et societes, V108, P155, DOI 10.3917/esp.g2002.108n1.0155