Exploring the use of QPID: A collaborative study of B2B in the automotive industry

被引:13
作者
Howard, M. [1 ]
Vidgen, R.
Powell, P.
Powell, J.
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Sch Management, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2007年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
QPID; action case; systems modelling; research methodology;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2005.09.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Deep and grounded understanding of complex socio-technical phenomena, such as business-to-business (B2B) information systems. requires a collaborative process of enquiry where the researcher works with practitioners to make sense and establish meaning. This suggests the need for interventionary approaches, such as action research and action case, supported by a method of notation for describing a co-constructed reality to make sense of inter-organizational settings and to undertake cross-case comparisons. This paper tests the conjecture that systems thinking and the qualitative politicized influence diagram (QPID) are an appropriate lens through which to study B2B information systems. It demonstrates how the QPID workshop is valuable in inter-organizational studies as a practical and appropriate method of collaborative investigation. The paper concludes by raising issues for research methodology in terms of limitations of the research method, recommendations for further development, and future plans for incorporating multiple partners in industry-level research. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 464
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Ackermann F., 2001, Rational analysis in a problematic world revisited, P43
[2]  
*ANE, 2004, AUTOMOTIVE NEWS EURO, P17
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The paradox of control in organizations
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The second Century: Reconnecting customers and value chain through Build-to-Order Moving beyond Mass and Lean in the Auto Indutry
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, European Journal of Purchasing Supply Management
[7]  
Bauer M. J., 2001, E BUSINESS STRATEGIC
[8]  
Braa K., 1999, ACCOUNTING MANAGEMEN, V9, P25, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0959-8022(98)00018-6, 10.1016/S0959-8022(98)00018-6]
[9]  
Checkland P., 1993, Systems thinking, systems practice
[10]  
Checkland P.Scholes., 1990, SOFT SYSTEMS METHODO