The immunogenicity and protection effect of an inactivated coxsackievirus A6, A10, and A16 vaccine against hand, foot, and mouth disease

被引:48
|
作者
Lim, Heeji [1 ,4 ,5 ]
In, Hyun Ju [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lee, Jung-Ah [2 ]
Yoo, Jung Sik [1 ]
Lee, Sang-Won [3 ]
Chung, Gyung Tae [1 ]
Choi, Young Ki [4 ,5 ]
Chung, Jae Keun [6 ]
Cho, Sun Ju [6 ]
Lee, June-Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Hlth, Div Vaccine Res, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Hlth, Div Emerging Infect Dis & Vector Res, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Strateg Planning Emerging Infect Dis, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[4] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Coll Med, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[5] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Med Res Inst, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[6] Hlth & Environm Res Inst Gwangju, Div Infect Dis Invest, Gwangju 61986, South Korea
关键词
Coxsackievirus; Inactivated vaccine; Multivalent; ENTEROVIRUS; 71; OUTBREAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.005
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Coxsackievirus belongs to the Enterovirus genus of the Picornaviridae family and is one of the major pathogens associated with human hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Historically, outbreaks of HFMD have mainly been caused by enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16. Recently, coxsackieviruses A6 and A10 have been associated with increased occurrences of sporadic HFMD cases and outbreak events globally. In this study, the immunogenicity of coxsackieviruses A6, A10, and A16 (CA6, CA10, and CA16), which were inactivated by formalin or beta-propiolactone (BPL) under different conditions, was evaluated as multivalent vaccine candidates. CA6 induced similar immune responses with both inactivation methods, and the immune efficacy of CA10 and CA16 was better following inactivation with BPL than with formalin. There was no sufficient cross-reactivity or cross-protectivity against heterologous strains in groups vaccinated with the BPL-inactivated (BI) monovalent vaccine. Sufficient neutralizing antibody and cell-mediated immune responses were induced in the BI-trivalent vaccinated group. These findings suggest that BI-CA6, CA10, and CA16 are potential multivalent vaccine candidates and that a multivalent vaccine is needed to control HFMD. The coxsackievirus multivalent vaccine could be useful for the development of effective HFMD vaccines. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3445 / 3452
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coxsackievirus A10 causing hand-foot-and-mouth disease in Uruguay
    Lizasoain, Andres
    Mir, Daiana
    Martinez, Natalia
    Colina, Rodney
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 94 : 1 - 3
  • [2] Efficacy of a Trivalent Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Vaccine against Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackieviruses A16 and A6 in Mice
    Caine, Elizabeth A.
    Fuchs, Jeremy
    Das, Subash C.
    Partidos, Charalambos D.
    Osorio, Jorge E.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2015, 7 (11): : 5919 - 5932
  • [3] Circulation of Coxsackievirus A10 and A6 in Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease in China, 2009-2011
    Lu, Qing-Bin
    Zhang, Xiao-Ai
    Wo, Ying
    Xu, Hong-Mei
    Li, Xiu-Jun
    Wang, Xian-Jun
    Ding, Shu-Jun
    Chen, Xiao-Dan
    He, Cui
    Liu, Li-Juan
    Li, Hao
    Yang, Hong
    Li, Ting-Yu
    Liu, Wei
    Cao, Wu-Chun
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [4] Synonymous codon usage analysis of hand, foot and mouth disease viruses: A comparative study on coxsackievirus A6, A10, A16, and enterovirus 71 from 2008 to 2015
    Su, Weiheng
    Li, Xue
    Chen, Meili
    Dai, Wenwen
    Sun, Shiyang
    Wang, Shuai
    Sheng, Xin
    Sun, Shixiang
    Gao, Chen
    Hou, Ali
    Zhou, Yan
    Sun, Bo
    Gao, Feng
    Xiao, Jingfa
    Zhang, Zhewen
    Jiang, Chunlai
    INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 53 : 212 - 217
  • [5] Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Caused by Coxsackievirus A6
    Flett, Kelly
    Youngster, Ilan
    Huang, Jennifer
    McAdam, Alexander
    Sandora, Thomas J.
    Rennick, Marcus
    Smole, Sandra
    Rogers, Shannon L.
    Nix, W. Allan
    Oberste, M. Steven
    Gellis, Stephen
    Ahmed, Asim A.
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 18 (10) : 1702 - 1704
  • [6] Hand-foot-and-mouth Disease Caused by Coxsackievirus A6 on the Rise
    Kimmis, Brooks David
    Downing, Christopher
    Tyring, Stephen
    CUTIS, 2018, 102 (05): : 353 - 356
  • [7] Rare occurrence of Coxsackievirus B4 along with Coxsackieviruses A6 and A10 from hand, foot and mouth disease
    Tambolkar, Sampada
    Chavan, Manasi
    Prasad, Prachi
    Lendave, Avinash
    Raut, Chandrashekhar
    Agarkhedkar, Sharad
    Bhawalkar, Jitendra
    JOURNAL OF KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY, 2023, 12 (03) : 3 - 11
  • [8] Isolation and molecular characterization of coxsackievirus A6 and coxsackievirus A16 from a case of recurrent Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 2018
    Saxena V.K.
    Pawar S.D.
    Qureshi T.H.I.H.
    Surve P.
    Yadav P.
    Nabi F.
    Mendadkar R.
    VirusDisease, 2020, 31 (1) : 56 - 60
  • [9] Co-circulation of coxsackieviruses A6 and A10 in hand, foot and mouth disease outbreak in Finland
    Blomqvist, Soile
    Klemola, Paivi
    Kaijalainen, Svetlana
    Paananen, Anja
    Simonen, Marja-Leena
    Vuorinen, Tytti
    Roivainen, Merja
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2010, 48 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [10] Hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with coxsackievirus A10: more serious than it seems
    Bian, Lianlian
    Gao, Fan
    Mao, Qunying
    Sun, Shiyang
    Wu, Xing
    Liu, Siyuan
    Yang, Xiaoming
    Liang, Zhenglun
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2019, 17 (04) : 233 - 242