On the duality of finite element discretization error control in computational Newtonian and Eshelbian mechanics

被引:4
|
作者
Rueter, Marcus
Stein, Erwin
机构
[1] Helsinki Univ Technol, Inst Math, Helsinki 02015, Finland
[2] Univ Hannover, Inst Mech & Computat Mech, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
关键词
a posteriori error estimation; duality techniques; Eshelbian mechanics; fracture mechanics; finite elasticity;
D O I
10.1007/s00466-006-0112-3
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In this paper, goal-oriented a posteriori error estimators of the averaging type are presented for the error obtained while approximately evaluating theJ-integral in nonlinear elastic fracture mechanics. Since the value of the J-integral is one component of the material force acting on the crack tip of a pre-cracked elastic body, the appropriate mechanical framework to be chosen is the one named after Eshelby rather than classical Newtonian mechanics. However, in a finite element setting, the discretized Eshelby problem is generally not solved explicitly. Rather, its solution is approximated by the finite element solution of the corresponding discretized dual Newton problem. As a consequence, discrete material forces arise not only at the crack tip but also at other nodes of the current finite element mesh. It is the objective of this paper to establish goal-oriented a posteriori error estimators in both the framework of Eshelbian and Newtonian mechanics and to elaborate their dual relations. This allows to control the error of the J-integral while, at the same time, no further discrete material forces arise during the adaptive mesh refinement process which could lead to misleading mechanical interpretations of the results obtained by the finite element method. The paper is concluded by numerical examples that illustrate our theoretical results.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 630
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Possibilities of the Particle Finite Element Method in Computational Mechanics
    Onate, Eugenio
    Idelsohn, Sergio R.
    Angel Celigueta, Miguel
    Rossi, Riccardo
    Latorre, Salvador
    COMPUTER METHODS IN MECHANICS, 2010, 1 : 271 - +
  • [22] Convergence of adaptive finite element methods in computational mechanics
    Carstensen, Carsten
    APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2009, 59 (09) : 2119 - 2130
  • [23] Advances in finite element analysis for computational mechanics 2015
    Wahab, Magd Abdel
    Noda, Nao-Aki
    Hung Nguyen Xuan
    Vicente Vanegas-Useche, Libardo
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 8 (08):
  • [24] ADAPTIVE FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS IN COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS
    JOHNSON, C
    HANSBO, P
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1992, 101 (1-3) : 143 - 181
  • [25] Advances in finite element analysis for computational mechanics 2015
    Wahab, Magd Abdel
    Noda, Nao-Aki
    Bordas, Stephane P. A.
    Zhu, Weidong
    Hung Nguyen Xuan
    Vicente Vanegas-Useche, Libardo
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 7 (07)
  • [26] A posteriori error estimation for finite element discretization of parameter identification problems
    Becker, R
    Vexler, B
    NUMERISCHE MATHEMATIK, 2004, 96 (03) : 435 - 459
  • [27] Finite Element Study On Mesh Discretization Error Estimation For Ansys Workbench
    Jalammanavar, Kuberappa
    Pujar, Nagabhushan
    Raj, Vishnu R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES, ELECTRONICS AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS (CTEMS), 2018, : 344 - 350
  • [28] A STUDY OF DISCRETIZATION ERROR IN THE FINITE-ELEMENT APPROXIMATION OF WAVE SOLUTIONS
    LEE, R
    CANGELLARIS, AC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1992, 40 (05) : 542 - 549
  • [29] ERROR ESTIMATES FOR A FINITE ELEMENT DISCRETIZATION OF A PHASE FIELD MODEL FOR MIXTURES
    Eck, Ch.
    Jadamba, B.
    Knabner, P.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 47 (06) : 4429 - 4445
  • [30] Computational error estimation and adaptive error control for a finite element solution of launch vehicle trajectory problems
    Estep, D
    Hodges, DH
    Warner, M
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2000, 21 (04): : 1609 - 1631