Analogues of engagement: Assessing tertiary student engagement in contemporary face-to-face and blended learning contexts

被引:18
作者
Bowden, Jana Lay-Hwa [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Business Sch, Dept Mkt, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Student engagement; student experience; student success; blended learning; online; face-to-face; covid; measurement;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2021.1901666
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Supporting student engagement and success across different types of educational delivery is of growing importance within the higher education sector. The digitalisation of the sector has required institutions to fundamentally reconsider their strategic approaches to the tertiary experience. Given that educational delivery is progressively more multi-modal, it is essential to understand how students engage during the contemporary tertiary experience as well as how the dimensions of engagement support student success. This study examines two antecedents to engagement, namely expectations and involvement, four dimensions of student engagement, namely behavioural, affective, social and cognitive engagement, and five student and institutional success outcomes, namely institutional reputation, student well-being, transformative learning, self-efficacy and self-esteem. Drawing on a sample of 952 tertiary students it employs a structural equation modelling approach to comparatively test how engagement determines success within face-to-face and blended modes of delivery. Behavioural engagement was found to strongly determine students' well-being, self-efficacy and self-esteem for students enrolled in blended modes. Affective engagement determined institutional reputation and transformative learning within blended modes. Counterintuitively, cognitive engagement was not a prominent driver of student or institutional success. This study advocates the need for a more holistic approach to managing blended deliveries which is sensitive to the multidimensional nature of student engagement and its impact on student and institutional success.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1012
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Allen I. E., 2007, Blending in the extent and promise of blended education in the United States
[2]   Student engagement: rhetoric and reality [J].
Baron, Paula ;
Corbin, Lillian .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 31 (06) :759-772
[3]   Self-efficacy and college students' perceptions and use of online learning systems [J].
Bates, Reid ;
Khasawneh, Samer .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 23 (01) :175-191
[4]   The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and Success: a holistic measurement approach [J].
Bowden, Jana Lay-Hwa ;
Tickle, Leonie ;
Naumann, Kay .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (06) :1207-1224
[5]   SELF-ESTEEM AND CLARITY OF THE SELF-CONCEPT [J].
CAMPBELL, JD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 59 (03) :538-549
[6]  
Cavdar N., 2018, RES J BUSINESS MANAG, V5
[7]  
Chao, 2012, INT J RES STUDIES ED, V1, DOI 10.5861/ijrse.2012.v1i1.19
[8]  
Christenson SL, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P813, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
[9]   Blended learning and team teaching: Adapting pedagogy in response to the changing digital tertiary environment [J].
Crawford, Renee ;
Jenkins, Louise .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 33 (02) :51-72
[10]  
Department of Education and Training, 2017, HIGH ED STAT STUD DA