Sources of uncertainty in long-term global scenarios of solar photovoltaic technology

被引:85
|
作者
Jaxa-Rozen, Marc [1 ]
Trutnevyte, Evelina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Sect Earth & Environm Sci, Inst Environm Sci ISE, Renewable Energy Syst, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS; ENERGY SCENARIO; ELECTRICITY; US; PROJECTIONS; VALIDATION; EMISSIONS; CHOICES; POWER;
D O I
10.1038/s41558-021-00998-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Analysis of 1,550 future energy scenarios finds that uncertainty in solar photovoltaic (PV) uptake is mainly driven by institutional differences in designing and modelling these scenarios, rather than PV cost assumptions. This suggests more organizational diversity is needed in IPCC scenario design. The deployment of solar photovoltaic (PV) technology has consistently outpaced expectations over the past decade. However, long-term prospects for PV remain deeply uncertain, as recent global scenarios span two orders of magnitude in installed PV capacity by 2050. Here we systematically compile an ensemble of 1,550 scenarios from peer-reviewed and influential grey literature, including IPCC and non-IPCC scenarios, and apply a statistical learning framework to link scenario characteristics with foreseen PV outcomes. We show that a large portion of the uncertainty in the global scenarios is associated with general features such as the type of organization, energy model and policy assumptions, without referring to specific techno-economic assumptions. IPCC scenarios consistently project lower PV adoption pathways and higher capital costs than non-IPCC scenarios. We thus recommend increasing the diversity of models and scenario methods included in IPCC assessments to represent the multiple perspectives present in the PV scenario literature.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 273
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A long-term, integrated impact assessment of alternative building energy code scenarios in China
    Yu, Sha
    Eom, Jiyong
    Evans, Meredydd
    Clarke, Leon
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 67 : 626 - 639
  • [32] Future costs of dementia-related long-term care: exploring future scenarios
    Comas-Herrera, Adelina
    Northey, Sara
    Wittenberg, Raphael
    Knapp, Martin
    Bhattacharyya, Sarmishtha
    Burns, Alistair
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2011, 23 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [33] Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios
    Schaeffer, Michiel
    Gohar, Laila
    Kriegler, Elmar
    Lowe, Jason
    Riahi, Keyvvan
    van Vuuren, Detlef
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 : 257 - 268
  • [34] ENERGY AND CO2 EMISSIONS IN KOREA - LONG-TERM SCENARIOS AND RELATED POLICIES
    LEE, HS
    RYU, JC
    ENERGY POLICY, 1991, 19 (10) : 926 - 933
  • [35] Long-term energy scenarios: Bridging the gap between socioeconomic storylines and energy modeling
    Fortes, Patricia
    Alvarenga, Antonio
    Seixas, Julia
    Rodrigues, Sofia
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 91 : 161 - 178
  • [36] Modelling the integrated power and transport energy system: The role of power-to-gas and hydrogen in long-term scenarios for Italy
    Colbertaldo, Paolo
    Guandalini, Giulio
    Campanari, Stefano
    ENERGY, 2018, 154 : 592 - 601
  • [37] Network Pricing for Multienergy Systems Under Long-Term Load Growth Uncertainty
    Cheng, Shuang
    Gu, Chenghong
    Yang, Xinhe
    Li, Shuangqi
    Fang, Lurui
    Li, Furong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2022, 13 (04) : 2715 - 2729
  • [38] Long-term economic impacts of energy development scenarios: The role of domestic electricity generation
    Lekavicius, Vidas
    Galinis, Arvydas
    Miskinis, Vaclovas
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 253
  • [39] Estimation of Uncertainty in Long-Term Sewer Sediment Predictions Using a Response Database
    Schellart, A. N. A.
    Tait, S. J.
    Ashley, R. M.
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2010, 136 (07): : 403 - 411
  • [40] Methods for including income distribution in global CGE models for long-term climate change research
    van Ruijven, Bas J.
    O'Neill, Brian C.
    Chateau, Jean
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 51 : 530 - 543