Targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate has limited additional benefit over background cores for larger MRI-identified tumors

被引:12
作者
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ]
Patterson, Andrew J. [1 ]
Koo, Brendan C. [1 ]
Wadhwa, Karan [3 ]
Warren, Anne Y. [4 ]
Doble, Andrew [3 ]
Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Kastner, Christof [3 ]
Gallagher, Ferdia A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[3] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[4] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Translat Prostate Canc Grp, Hutchinson MRC Res Ctr, Cambridge, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Image-guided biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasound; Transperineal; Prostate cancer; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-015-1650-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To compare histological outcomes in patients undergoing MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion transperineal (MTTP) prostate biopsy and determine the incremental benefit of targeted cores. Seventy-six consecutive patients with 89 MRI-identified targets underwent MTTP biopsy. Separate targeted biopsies and background cores were obtained according to a standardized protocol. Target biopsies were considered of added diagnostic value if these cores showed a higher Gleason grade than non-targeted cores taken from the same sector (Group 1, n = 41). Conversely, where background cores demonstrated an equal or higher Gleason grade, target cores were considered to be non-beneficial (Group 2, n = 48). There was no significant difference in age, PSA, prostate volume, time-to-biopsy, and number of cores obtained between the groups. A greater proportion of target cores were positive for cancer (158/228; 69.3 %) compared to background (344/1881; 18.38 %). The median target volume was 0.54 cm(3) for Group 1 (range 0.09-2.79 cm(3)) and 1.65 cm(3) for Group 2 (0.3-9.07 cm(3)), p < 0.001. The targets in Group 1 had statistically lower diameters for short and long axes, even after correction for gland size. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was demonstrated when a lesion cutoff value of 1.0 cm in short axis was applied, resulting in a sensitivity of 83.3 % and a specificity of 82.9 %. When a combined systematic and targeted transperineal prostate biopsy is performed, there is limited benefit in acquiring additional cores from larger-volume targets with a short axis diameter > 1.0 cm.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 508
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Arya, Manit ;
Illing, Rowland ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Allen, Clare ;
Emberton, Mark .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 6 (04) :197-206
[2]   A biomedical engineering approach to mitigate the errors of prostate biopsy [J].
Ahmed, Hashim Uddin ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Kepner, Gordon ;
Kepner, Jeremy .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2012, 9 (04) :227-U81
[3]   Transition zone prostate cancers: Features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging [J].
Akin, Oguz ;
Sala, Evis ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Kuroiwa, Kentaro ;
Ishill, Nicole M. ;
Pucar, Darko ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (03) :784-792
[4]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[5]   Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: The role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostate - A 4-year experience [J].
Barzell, Winston E. ;
Melamed, Myron R. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (6A) :27-35
[6]   Transperineal biopsy of the prostate-is this the future? [J].
Chang, Dwayne T. S. ;
Challacombe, Benjamin ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2013, 10 (12) :690-702
[7]   Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparison of Random and Targeted Biopsies [J].
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Peyromaure, Michael ;
Schull, Alexandre ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Bouazza, Naim ;
Flam, Thierry ;
Zerbib, Marc ;
Muradyan, Naira ;
Legman, Paul ;
Cornud, Francois .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) :493-499
[8]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting [J].
Dickinson, Louise ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Allen, Clare ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Carey, Brendan ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. ;
Hoskin, Peter J. ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Persad, Raj ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Punwani, Shonit ;
Sohaib, Aslam S. ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (04) :477-494
[9]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[10]   Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool [J].
Gaziev, Gabriele ;
Wadhwa, Karan ;
Barrett, Tristan ;
Koo, Brendan C. ;
Gallagher, Ferdia A. ;
Serrao, Eva ;
Frey, Julia ;
Seidenader, Jonas ;
Carmona, Lina ;
Warren, Anne ;
Gnanapragasam, Vincent ;
Doble, Andrew ;
Kastner, Christof .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (01) :80-86